| Niyamam AI

Displaying 13311 - 13315 of 15270

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Panakkal Muhammed's Children et al vs Panakkal Muhammed's Children et al regarding partition

Partition Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 140 OF 2017

Tirur

2017-07-26

Not mentioned

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Thithikkutty Hajjumma et al vs Moorkkath Ravikumar et al regarding injunction

Civil Suit - Injunction

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 90 OF 2012

Tirur

2017-07-26

5 years 8 months 14 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Mannil Kunhalan Haji's Children et al vs Payyanatt Damodaran regarding rent arrears

Rent Control Petition

RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 60 OF 2015

Tirur

2017-07-26

2 years

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Paarammal Hussain vs Chaatheri Abdu Rahiman regarding restoration petition

Restoration Petition

Restoration Petition 991/2017

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-07-25

0 years, 3 months, 29 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Ramachandramenon vs Venugopalan regarding possession and partition

Civil Suit - Recovery of Possession and Partition

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 139/2014

Tirur

2017-07-25

3 years 13 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,270 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.3 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 807 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 682 cases)
Sale deed (in 574 cases)
Postal receipt (in 543 cases)
Tax receipt (in 530 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 7721
Defendant Won: 6453

6453

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

18%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs failed to pay necessary court fees leading to petition dismissal for default.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Plaintiffs were unable to provide sufficient evidence to support their claims.

Found in 24 cases (24%) High Impact

Failure to Issue Required Notices

Petitioners did not take necessary steps to issue notices to defendants, causing dismissals.

Found in 20 cases (20%) High Impact

Absence of the Petitioner in Court

Plaintiffs were often not present in court, leading to automatic case dismissal.

Found in 14 cases (14%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Issue Required Notices

Absence of the Petitioner in Court

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?