| Niyamam AI

Displaying 13156 - 13160 of 15270

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Vathsala vs Janaki et al regarding partition

Civil Suit - Partition

ORIGINAL SUIT NO.373 OF 2016

Tirur

2017-09-16

1 year

Dismissed

View Full Details

Case between Puthanveettil Hashim et al vs Karattu thodi Moideen kutty et al regarding declaration and permanent injunction

Civil Suit - Declaration and Permanent Injunction

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 77 OF 2000

Tirur

2017-09-16

17 years

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Mailadimmal Hamza vs Thachanattil Viswanathan et al regarding injunction

Civil Suit - Injunction

ORIGINAL SUIT No.190 OF 2014

Tirur

2017-09-16

3 years 20 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Peringottukara Chirs Ltd. vs N.P. Hussain regarding Enforcement Petition

Enforcement Petition

EP 155/2015

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-09-16

2 years, 2 months, 26 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between The Secretary vs Prabhakaran et al regarding Default in Execution Proceedings

Civil Suit - Default in Execution Proceedings

EP 328/2015

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-09-16

1 year, 11 months, 4 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,270 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.3 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 807 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 682 cases)
Sale deed (in 574 cases)
Postal receipt (in 543 cases)
Tax receipt (in 530 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 7721
Defendant Won: 6453

6453

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

26%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay the required batta for their petitions, leading to dismissals.

Found in 26 cases (26%) Medium Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Dismissals occurred when plaintiffs could not present sufficient evidence to support their claims.

Found in 24 cases (24%) Medium Impact

Absence of Petitioner in Court

Many cases were dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiff or petitioner during the proceedings.

Found in 22 cases (22%) Medium Impact

Failure to Take Required Steps

Plaintiffs often failed to take necessary procedural steps, like issuing notices, resulting in case dismissals.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Absence of Petitioner in Court

Failure to Take Required Steps

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?