| Niyamam AI

Displaying 13016 - 13020 of 15270

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Perumanna Klari Service Sahakarana Bank vs Prabhakaran Kandayi regarding Dismissal of Execution Petition

Execution Petition

EP 64/2017

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-10-26

0 years, 7 months, 24 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Perumanna Klari Service Sahakarana Bank No.F.770 vs Peranthan Kummarambil regarding court decree enforcement

Civil Suit - Decree Enforcement

EP 76/2017

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-10-26

0 years, 7 months, 23 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Enikutty vs Ummer kutty regarding property delivery

Execution Petition - Property Delivery

EP 127/2017

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-10-26

0 years, 5 months, 4 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Tharammal Suheela vs M.A.Hussain regarding property delivery

Execution Petition

EP 162/2017

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-10-26

0 years, 3 months, 15 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between K.Balachandran vs A.Suliman regarding Cheque Dishonour

Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour

S.T. No:132/2015

Tirur

2017-10-26

2 years

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,270 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.3 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 807 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 682 cases)
Sale deed (in 574 cases)
Postal receipt (in 543 cases)
Tax receipt (in 530 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 7721
Defendant Won: 6453

6453

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

41%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay necessary fees or batta, leading to default dismissals.

Found in 41 cases (41%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Many cases were dismissed due to the plaintiffs' inability to provide evidence regarding defendants' means to pay debts.

Found in 30 cases (30%) High Impact

Absence of the Plaintiff

Numerous dismissals occurred due to the absence of plaintiffs in court, impacting case proceedings.

Found in 16 cases (16%) Medium Impact

Failure to Issue Notices

Dismissing parties often neglected to issue required notices to defendants, resulting in case closures.

Found in 10 cases (10%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment

Lack of Evidence Presented

Absence of the Plaintiff

Failure to Issue Notices

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?