| Niyamam AI

Displaying 12936 - 12940 of 15270

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Abdul Asees vs Rahmath regarding relief petition

Civil Petition - Relief

Restor. 2324/2017

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-11-18

0 years, 1 months, 11 days

Petitioner

View Full Details

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Sujatha et al regarding loan recovery

Civil Suit - Recovery of Money

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 45 OF 2016

Tirur

2017-11-18

1 year

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Fathima vs Thalappil Moideenkutty's children et al regarding declaration and partition

Civil Suit - Declaration and Partition

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 157 OF 2014

Tirur

2017-11-18

3 years

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Aali Muhammed et al vs Muhammedkutty et al regarding boundary fixation and mandatory injunction

Civil Suit - Boundary Fixation and Mandatory Injunction

ORIGINAL SUIT No.272 OF 2012

Tirur

2017-11-18

5 years 11 months 6 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between SML Finance Limited et al vs T.S.Manoj kumar et al regarding money

Civil Suit - Money Recovery

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 204 OF 2016

Tirur

2017-11-17

1 year

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,270 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.3 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 807 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 682 cases)
Sale deed (in 574 cases)
Postal receipt (in 543 cases)
Tax receipt (in 530 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 7721
Defendant Won: 6453

6453

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

22%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Petitions were often dismissed due to failure to pay necessary fees for processing, particularly in execution proceedings.

Found in 22 cases (22%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Many cases were dismissed for the inability to present evidence proving the financial capacity of the respondents.

Found in 20 cases (20%) High Impact

Absence of Petitioner

Frequent dismissals were reported where petitioners did not appear in court during the proceedings.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

No Steps Taken

Several cases were dismissed because petitioners failed to take required steps for notice issuance or other procedural actions.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Absence of Petitioner

No Steps Taken

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?