| Niyamam AI

Displaying 12891 - 12895 of 15270

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Ullattil Gopinath vs Accomplish Marketing Company(Pvt) Ltd et al regarding money realization

Civil Suit - Money Realization

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 379 OF 2016

Tirur

2017-11-27

1 year and 11 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Ramla et al vs Ayishu et al regarding partition of property

Civil Suit - Partition

INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION No. 498 OF 2016

Tirur

2017-11-30

2 years 11 months 5 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Soudamini et al vs Vattakandi Karunakaran's Children et al regarding partition of property

Civil Suit - Partition

INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION No. 1492 OF 2016

Tirur

2017-11-30

5 years 5 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Pallippurath Ramla vs Accomplish Marketing Company et al regarding loan agreement dispute

Civil Suit - Debt Recovery

ORIGINAL PETITION (PAUPER) No.113 OF 2016

Tirur

2017-11-30

1 year

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Haneefa.K regarding settlement of matter

Unknown

EP 199/2017

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-11-30

0 years, 3 months, 11 days

Unknown

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,270 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.3 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 807 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 682 cases)
Sale deed (in 574 cases)
Postal receipt (in 543 cases)
Tax receipt (in 530 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 7721
Defendant Won: 6453

6453

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

18%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs failed to pay the necessary batta, leading to dismissals for default.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Absence of Plaintiff in Court

Frequent dismissals occurred due to the absence of the plaintiff during hearings.

Found in 16 cases (16%) Medium Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Plaintiffs did not present sufficient evidence to support their claims, resulting in case dismissals.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

Failure to Issue Required Notices

Many cases were dismissed as plaintiffs failed to issue necessary notices to the defendants.

Found in 14 cases (14%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Absence of Plaintiff in Court

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Issue Required Notices

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?