| Niyamam AI

Displaying 12861 - 12865 of 15270

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Saithalavi et al vs Moosa regarding cheque dishonour

Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour

S.T. No:136/2017

Tirur

2017-12-13

Not mentioned

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Mammakkanath Abdulla Haji vs Mammakkanakathu Abdurahiman Musliyar's Children et al regarding partition

Civil Suit - Partition

INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 1545 OF 2003

Tirur

2017-12-12

11 years 11 months 12 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Velladath Muhammed Hassan et al vs Panikkaveettil Chorath Sirajudheen et al regarding Specific Performance

Civil Suit - Specific Performance

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 116 OF 2016

Tirur

2017-12-12

1 year

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Jyothish vs Accomplish Marketing Company (Pvt.) Ltd regarding money deposit agreement

Civil Suit - Money Recovery

ORIGINAL PETITION (Pauper) No. 11 OF 2017

Tirur

2017-12-11

Not mentioned

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Kondarath Cheriya Muhammed's children vs Kondarath Abdul Rasheed regarding Interlocutory Application

Interlocutory Application

Original Suit No. 308 OF 2016

2019-10-29

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,270 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.3 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 807 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 682 cases)
Sale deed (in 574 cases)
Postal receipt (in 543 cases)
Tax receipt (in 530 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 7721
Defendant Won: 6453

6453

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

27%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Petitioners consistently failed to make required batta payments, leading to case dismissals for default.

Found in 27 cases (27%) Medium Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Plaintiffs often failed to provide sufficient evidence to prove their claims, resulting in dismissals.

Found in 26 cases (26%) Medium Impact

Failure to Take Action

Many cases were dismissed due to plaintiffs not taking necessary procedural actions, like issuing notices.

Found in 25 cases (25%) Medium Impact

Absence of the Plaintiff

A significant number of petitions were dismissed due to the petitioner's absence from court hearings.

Found in 22 cases (22%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Take Action

Absence of the Plaintiff

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?