| Niyamam AI

Displaying 12786 - 12790 of 15270

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Nafeesumol et al vs Nasar et al regarding injunction

Civil Suit - Injunction

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 86 OF 20 15

Tirur

2018-01-09

Unknown

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between ThandamValappil Nasar et al vs Kundam Kandathil Kadeeja regarding partition

Civil Suit - Partition

Original Suit No. 93 OF 2014

Tirur Taluk

2018-01-09

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Kappattakath Puthiyanalakath Musthafa and others vs Kappattakath Puthiya Nalakath Ayoob and K.P. Hameed regarding injunction

Civil Suit - Injunction

ORIGINAL SUIT NO.197 OF 2014

Tirur

2018-01-09

3 years

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Muahmmed Nasar et al vs Tharammal Muhammed et al regarding final decree

Civil Suit - Final Decree

INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO.683 OF 2015

Tirur

2018-01-08

4 years and 24 days

Dismissed

View Full Details

Case between Mailadimmal Hamza vs Thachanattil Viswanathan et al regarding restoration of dismissed suit

Civil Suit - Restoration of dismissed suit

INTERLLOCUTORY APPLICATION No. 2447 OF 2017

Tirur

2018-01-01

3 years 3 months 16 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,270 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.3 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 807 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 682 cases)
Sale deed (in 574 cases)
Postal receipt (in 543 cases)
Tax receipt (in 530 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 7721
Defendant Won: 6453

6453

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

30%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs often failed to pay necessary court fees, leading to petition dismissal.

Found in 30 cases (30%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Provided

Plaintiffs typically did not present adequate evidence to support their claims, resulting in dismissal.

Found in 27 cases (27%) High Impact

No Steps Taken in Case

Repeatedly, plaintiffs failed to take necessary procedural steps, leading to their petitions being dismissed.

Found in 25 cases (25%) Medium Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

The petitioner often did not appear in court, causing their petition to be dismissed.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Provided

No Steps Taken in Case

Absence of the Petitioner

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?