| Niyamam AI

Displaying 12606 - 12610 of 15270

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Sakkeena vs Parambil Abdul Kareem regarding mandatory injunction and realization of damages

Civil Suit - Mandatory injunction and damages

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 97 OF 20 15

Tirur

2018-03-08

2 years

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Kousallya et al vs Devaki et al regarding partition

Civil Suit - Partition

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 103 OF 2015

Tirur

2018-03-08

2 years 5 months 19 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Keezheparambatil Kunhi Mohammed's Children et al vs Keezheparambatil Kunhi Mohammed's Children et al regarding partition

Civil Suit - Partition

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 228 OF 20 15

Tirur

2018-03-08

Not mentioned

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Ali vs Unni and Shamsudheen regarding Suit Restoration

Civil Suit - Restoration

EP 220/2017

Tirur, Malappuram

2018-03-08

0 years, 4 months, 26 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Ishabi vs Mundathod Muhammad Kutty Haji regarding Restoration Petition

Restoration Petition

Restor.Ptn 100/2018

Tirur, Malappuram

2018-03-07

0 years, 1 month, 29 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,270 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.3 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 807 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 682 cases)
Sale deed (in 574 cases)
Postal receipt (in 543 cases)
Tax receipt (in 530 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 7721
Defendant Won: 6453

6453

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

15%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs failed to pay the necessary fees for court proceedings, leading to case dismissal.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Insufficient or absence of evidence to support the petitioner's claims resulted in dismissal.

Found in 24 cases (24%) High Impact

Failure to Take Steps

Plaintiffs did not take proper legal steps, resulting in their cases being dismissed.

Found in 20 cases (20%) High Impact

Absence of Petitioners in Court

Non-appearance of the plaintiffs or petitioners at court hearings led to abandonment of the cases.

Found in 14 cases (14%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Take Steps

Absence of Petitioners in Court

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?