| Niyamam AI

Displaying 12326 - 12330 of 15270

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Hassan.K vs K. Hamza et al regarding damages, mandatory injunction, and declaration

Civil Suit - Damages, Mandatory Injunction, Declaration

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 462 OF 2014

Tirur

2018-09-29

3 years 21 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Kunhimuhammed vs Muhammed Shafi regarding dishonour of cheque

Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour

S.T. No: 106/2017

Tirur

2018-09-29

3 years 6 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Nafeesu vs Abdul Rasak regarding restoration petition settlement

Restoration Petition

Restor.Ptn. 1897/2018

Tirur, Malappuram

2018-09-28

0 years, 0 months, 23 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Shida vs Bindhu et al regarding Injunction

Civil Suit - Injunction

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 187 OF 2017

Tirur

2018-09-27

1 year

Dismissed

View Full Details

Case between Hamza.E.P. vs Satheesan.P. regarding money loan

Civil Suit - Money Recovery

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 194 OF 2018

Tirur

2018-09-28

Not mentioned

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,270 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.3 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 807 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 682 cases)
Sale deed (in 574 cases)
Postal receipt (in 543 cases)
Tax receipt (in 530 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 7721
Defendant Won: 6453

6453

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

20%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Numerous petitions were dismissed due to plaintiffs' failure to pay the necessary batta for court proceedings.

Found in 20 cases (20%) High Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

Several cases were dismissed as the petitioners were not present in court during proceedings.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

Lack of Necessary Evidence

Many petitions were dismissed due to the absence of sufficient evidence to support the claims made by the plaintiffs.

Found in 30 cases (30%) High Impact

Failure to Issue Notices

Petitions were frequently dismissed because plaintiffs failed to issue necessary notices to the respondents as required by law.

Found in 10 cases (10%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Absence of the Petitioner

Lack of Necessary Evidence

Failure to Issue Notices

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?