| Niyamam AI

Displaying 12146 - 12150 of 15270

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Fasil vs Ishaq regarding U/s. 138 of N.I. Act

Criminal Case

S.T. 173/2017

TIRUR

2019-12-12

Unknown

View Full Details

Case between Abdul Jaleel vs Manager, Shriram Transport Finance Co. Ltd. regarding prohibitory injunction

Injunction

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 276 OF 2018

2019-12-09

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between The Secretary Ozhur Service Co-operative Bank vs Thottiyil Basheer et al regarding Loan closing and satisfaction

EP 59/2018

Tirur, Malappuram

2019-12-09

1 year 9 months 11 days

Unknown

View Full Details

Case between Saidhali vs Faisal regarding U/s 138 of N.I. Act

Criminal Case

S.T. No: 15/2018

2019-11-12

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Rabiya vs P.Karunakaranj regarding Debt Recovery

Debt Recovery

EP 91/2017

Tirur, Malappuram

2019-11-04

2 years 7 months 11 days

Unknown

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,270 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.3 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 807 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 682 cases)
Sale deed (in 574 cases)
Postal receipt (in 543 cases)
Tax receipt (in 530 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 7721
Defendant Won: 6453

6453

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

27%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs consistently failed to pay required court fees, impacting case progression.

Found in 27 cases (27%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Many dismissals occurred due to insufficient evidence to support plaintiff's claims or demonstrate means of payment.

Found in 25 cases (25%) High Impact

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

Plaintiffs frequently did not follow court procedures, such as issuing notices or providing necessary documentation.

Found in 21 cases (21%) Medium Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

Several petitions were dismissed because the plaintiff did not appear in court during crucial hearings.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

Absence of the Petitioner

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?