| Niyamam AI

Displaying 12051 - 12055 of 15270

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Abdu Rahman vs Ajeesh regarding Offence u/s. 138 of N.I. Act

Criminal Case

ST No: 157/2017

Tirur

2019-11-15

Unknown

View Full Details

Case between Abdu Rahman vs Ajeesh regarding U/s. 138 of N.I. Act

Criminal Case

S.T. No: 166/2017

TIRUR

2019-11-15

Unknown

View Full Details

Case between Abdu Rahman vs Ajeesh regarding U/s. 138 of N.I. Act

Unknown

S.T. No: 174/2017

2019-11-15

Unknown

View Full Details

Case between Abdu Rahman vs Ajeesh regarding offense under U/s. 138 of N.I. Act

Criminal Case

ST No: 183/2017

TIRUR

2019-11-15

Unknown

View Full Details

Case between Vijaya Bank, Tirur Branch vs Subramanian C. et al regarding Realization of Money

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 19 OF 2019

TIRUR

2019-11-14

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,270 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.3 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 807 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 682 cases)
Sale deed (in 574 cases)
Postal receipt (in 543 cases)
Tax receipt (in 530 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 7721
Defendant Won: 6453

6453

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

24%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs failed to pay necessary fees for filing or processing the petition.

Found in 24 cases (24%) High Impact

Failure to Present Evidence

Lack of sufficient evidence to support claims or demonstrate financial means of respondents led to dismissals.

Found in 23 cases (23%) High Impact

Absence of Petitioner

Dismissals occurred due to petitioner's failure to appear in court for hearings.

Found in 19 cases (19%) Medium Impact

No Steps Taken in Case

Plaintiffs did not take necessary legal actions, leading to automatic dismissals of their cases.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Failure to Present Evidence

Absence of Petitioner

No Steps Taken in Case

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?