| Niyamam AI

Displaying 11716 - 11720 of 15270

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Krishnankutty N K et al vs Rethnamma et al regarding Temporary Injunction

Injunction

I. A No.02/2025 in OS No.72/2025

Perumbavoor

2025-11-14

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Vinu K Joy vs State of Kerala et al regarding civil suit

Civil Suit

O. S. No.256/2022

Perumbavoor

2025-11-14

Dismissed

View Full Details

Case between Usha Sukumaran et al vs Varghese et al regarding Decree

Civil Suit

O.S No.387/2017

2025-11-14

Unknown

View Full Details

Case between Rojar Antony Vakayil vs Vasudevan Nair et al regarding Commission Report and Survey Plan discrepancies

Civil Case

I.A No.02/2025 in OS No.100/2017

2025-11-13

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Neena S. Raman vs Parukutty et al regarding undisclosed matter

Civil Suit

OS.148/2020

Perumbavoor

2025-11-12

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,270 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.3 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 807 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 682 cases)
Sale deed (in 574 cases)
Postal receipt (in 543 cases)
Tax receipt (in 530 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 7721
Defendant Won: 6453

6453

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

36%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed due to their failure to pay necessary court fees or related costs.

Found in 36 cases (36%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Many plaintiffs could not demonstrate sufficient evidence to support their claims or prove financial capacity.

Found in 27 cases (27%) Medium Impact

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

Plaintiffs often neglected to take required procedural steps, including issuing notices or filing documents.

Found in 22 cases (22%) Medium Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

Case dismissals frequently occurred because the plaintiff did not appear in court to present their case.

Found in 19 cases (19%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

Absence of the Petitioner

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?