| Niyamam AI

Displaying 11681 - 11685 of 15270

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Latha Murali vs Subaida P et al regarding Restoration Petition

Restoration Petition

O.S. No. 1087/2024

Ernakulam

2025-07-11

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Remya Pillai, W/o Prashanth Kumar M R vs Annamma P B regarding Suit filed Under Section 26 Order VII Rule 1 of The Code of Civil Procedure

Civil Procedure

O.S. No.24/2021

Ernakulam

2025-01-06

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Bhanumathy et al vs Rajagopalan regarding review petition in Original Suit No.1391/2005

Review Petition

Review Petition No.86/2024

ERNAKULAM

2025-01-06

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Bhanumathy et al vs Radhakrishnan et al regarding review of judgment and decree passed in O.S. No.1396/2005

Review Petition

Review Petition No.87/2024 in O.S. No.1396/2005

ERNAKULAM

2025-01-06

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Mrs. Susan Jacob John @ Susan John & Dr. Maria Kuriakose vs Mr. Annekot Ramadasan Padmakumar regarding Petition filed under Section 11(2)(b) of the Kerala (Buildings Lease & Rent Control) Act, 1965

Rent Control Petition

R.C.P. No. 78/2024

2025-01-04

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,270 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.3 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 807 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 682 cases)
Sale deed (in 574 cases)
Postal receipt (in 543 cases)
Tax receipt (in 530 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 7721
Defendant Won: 6453

6453

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

34%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs often failed to pay necessary court fees, leading to case dismissal.

Found in 34 cases (34%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Provided

Absence of sufficient evidence to support claims resulted in dismissal of many cases.

Found in 25 cases (25%) Medium Impact

Failure to Take Required Steps

Many cases were dismissed because plaintiffs did not take necessary procedural steps.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Absence of the Petitioners

Cases were frequently dismissed due to plaintiffs' absence in court during hearings.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Provided

Failure to Take Required Steps

Absence of the Petitioners

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?