| Niyamam AI

Displaying 11501 - 11505 of 15270

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between His Holiness Shrimad Raghavendra Thirtha Swami et al vs Venkatesh Shenoy et al regarding declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

O.S. No.1585/2019

Ernakulam

2025-02-22

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between P.B Gopalakrishnan vs Ms. Dilshana Siyad regarding Rent Control Petition

Rent Control Petition

R.C.P. No.36/2024

Ernakulam

2025-02-21

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Keecheri Sree Rama Varma Kerala Pattarya Samajam vs P.U. Rameshan regarding rent control compliance

Rent Control Petition

R.C.P. No.59/2020

Ernakulam

2025-02-21

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Dr. M.N Subramanian et al vs M/s Jigucheon Pvt Ltd et al regarding Rent Control Petition

Rent Control Petition

R.C.P. No.157/2023

Ernakulam

2025-02-21

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Peter et al vs Aravind Kumar et al regarding dismissal of suit

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 07/2018

Ernakulam

2025-02-21

Dismissed

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,270 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.3 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 807 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 682 cases)
Sale deed (in 574 cases)
Postal receipt (in 543 cases)
Tax receipt (in 530 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 7721
Defendant Won: 6453

6453

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

31%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed due to not paying the required batta for court proceedings.

Found in 31 cases (31%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Many cases were dismissed due to plaintiffs failing to provide adequate evidence to support their claims.

Found in 28 cases (28%) Medium Impact

Failure to Take Procedural Steps

Plaintiffs often did not take necessary procedural actions such as issuing notices or representation.

Found in 22 cases (22%) Medium Impact

Default in Representation

Many cases were dismissed as plaintiffs failed to appear or represent themselves in court.

Found in 19 cases (19%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Take Procedural Steps

Default in Representation

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?