| Niyamam AI

Displaying 11371 - 11375 of 15270

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Viswanathan R et al vs Kousalya et al regarding boundary excavation and property support.

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 426/2025

2025-07-01

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Antony Lal P A vs Prince P Jacob regarding a suit filed under Section 26 and Order 7 Rule 1 of The Code of Civil Procedure.

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 708/2023

Ernakulam

2025-07-01

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Narayanan G vs C.V Rajesh et al regarding mandatory and permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 954/2022

Ernakulam

2025-07-01

Partial

View Full Details

Case between Itty Cherian @ Sajan vs Saleem et al regarding suit dismissal for default

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 987/2019

Ernakulam District

2025-07-01

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Adv. V Devashikhamony vs Abdul Nazar Sait et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 1233/2017

Ernakulam

2025-08-22

approximately-3 years 1 month

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,270 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.3 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 807 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 682 cases)
Sale deed (in 574 cases)
Postal receipt (in 543 cases)
Tax receipt (in 530 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 7721
Defendant Won: 6453

6453

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

27%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta Fees

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay necessary fees, leading to dismissal for default.

Found in 27 cases (27%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Cases were dismissed due to insufficient evidence proving financial means of the respondents.

Found in 23 cases (23%) High Impact

No Steps Taken

Many cases were dismissed because the plaintiffs took no action in pursuing their petitions.

Found in 21 cases (21%) Medium Impact

Absence of Petitioners

Dismissals occurred when the petitioners were not present in court for their hearings.

Found in 17 cases (17%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta Fees

Lack of Evidence Presented

No Steps Taken

Absence of Petitioners

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?