| Niyamam AI

Displaying 11121 - 11125 of 15270

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between P. B. Gopalakrishnan vs Ms. Dilshana Siyad regarding vacant possession.

Execution Petition

E.P No. 176/2025

Ernakulam

2025-11-01

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between M/s Punjab National Bank vs Ann Jose regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 1169/2023

Ernakulam, Kerala

2025-11-20

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between K.Vilasini alias Vilasini Sethumadhavan et al vs Smt.Sukumari et al regarding appointment of an Advocate Commissioner

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 937/2017

Ernakulam

2025-11-20

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Lalithamma Radhakrishna Menon vs Cheranellor Grama Panchayath regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 922/2021

Ernakulam

2025-11-20

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Jayan. K.S et al vs M/s. Tata Motors Finance Ltd et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

O.S. No.856/2018

Ernakulam

2025-11-20

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,270 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.3 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 807 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 682 cases)
Sale deed (in 574 cases)
Postal receipt (in 543 cases)
Tax receipt (in 530 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 7721
Defendant Won: 6453

6453

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

28%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed due to non-payment of batta, resulting in dismissal for default.

Found in 28 cases (28%) Medium Impact

Lack of Evidence

Plaintiffs often failed to provide adequate evidence to substantiate their claims, leading to case dismissals.

Found in 24 cases (24%) High Impact

Failure to Take Steps

Dismissing cases were common when plaintiffs did not take necessary procedural steps.

Found in 20 cases (20%) High Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

Petition dismissals occurred frequently when the plaintiffs were absent during hearings.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence

Failure to Take Steps

Absence of the Petitioner

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?