| Niyamam AI

Displaying 10876 - 10880 of 15270

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Annie Telma D'Silva vs TJ Job et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 450/2025

Ernakulam

2025-11-28

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between T.K.Shoukath Ali et al vs The Puthupallipuram SNDP Branch no. 219 et al regarding prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

O.S No. 505/2023

Ernakulam

2025-11-28

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between K.V. Thomas et al vs M/s ALTAIM et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Civil Suit

O.S No. 603/2024

2025-11-28

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Karollil Sankaran vs Yes Bank Limited et al regarding dismissal of suit

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 625/2024

Ernakulam

2025-11-28

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Thiruvithamkoor Devaswam Board et al vs Sindhu K.P. regarding payment of court fees.

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 850/2023

Ernakulam

2025-11-28

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,270 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.3 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 807 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 682 cases)
Sale deed (in 574 cases)
Postal receipt (in 543 cases)
Tax receipt (in 530 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 7721
Defendant Won: 6453

6453

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

30%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Failure to Provide Evidence

Plaintiffs did not present sufficient evidence to establish their claims or the financial means of the respondents.

Found in 30 cases (30%) High Impact

Non-Payment of Batta Fees

Cases were dismissed for plaintiffs' failure to pay necessary court fees required for proceeding with their claims.

Found in 24 cases (24%) Medium Impact

Default Due to Lack of Representation

Many petitions were dismissed because the plaintiffs failed to appear in court or represent themselves appropriately.

Found in 21 cases (21%) Medium Impact

Failure to Issue Necessary Notices

Cases were dismissed due to the plaintiffs' inability to issue required notices to relevant parties in a timely manner.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Failure to Provide Evidence

Non-Payment of Batta Fees

Default Due to Lack of Representation

Failure to Issue Necessary Notices

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?