| Niyamam AI

Displaying 10831 - 10835 of 15270

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Eldho Olickal vs Madhu regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 193/2025

Ernakulam, Kerala

2025-10-06

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between C. Raveendranath et al vs All Kerala Homeopathic Association et al regarding non prosecution

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 929/2017

Ernakulam

2025-10-06

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Rekha Ramakrishnan vs Padmakumar et al regarding Permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 1112/2016

Ernakulam

2025-10-06

9 years 0 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Sony Thomas vs Thressiamma Joseph regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 1118/2023

2025-10-06

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Betty Francis vs A.M. Aslam regarding rent control petition

Rent Control Petition

R.C.P. No. 84/2024

Ernakulam

2025-10-04

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,270 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.3 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 807 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 682 cases)
Sale deed (in 574 cases)
Postal receipt (in 543 cases)
Tax receipt (in 530 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 7721
Defendant Won: 6453

6453

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

37%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Fees or Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay required fees or batta, leading to petition dismissals.

Found in 37 cases (37%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Insufficient evidence showcasing the financial capacity or other relevant information led to case dismissals.

Found in 28 cases (28%) Medium Impact

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

Many plaintiffs did not take necessary procedural steps, including filing notices or responses, resulting in dismissals.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

The petitioner's absence in court was a significant reason for case dismissals in several instances.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Fees or Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

Absence of the Petitioner

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?