| Niyamam AI

Displaying 10781 - 10785 of 15270

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Mr. Sanjeeve M.S. vs Mrs.Anu Manoj regarding rent control

Rent Control Petition

R.C.P. No. 16/2025

Ernakulam

2025-10-14

1 month 16 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between M/s QUBEFIX vs Rasheeda Marikar et al regarding eviction and rent arrears

Civil Suit

O.S No. 212/2025

Ernakulam

2025-06-11

approximately-1 year 6 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between C K Suresh Babu vs Dino P A regarding reopening of evidence in a civil suit

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 506/2021

Ernakulam

2025-10-14

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Penta Tower Owners Association vs Assistant Executive Engineer, Public Works Department - Roads et al regarding mandatory injunction for access to property.

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 906/2021

Ernakulam

2025-10-14

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Celine George vs Thilothama Karthikeyan et al regarding issuance of a temporary prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

O.S No. 978/2024

Ernakulam

2025-10-14

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,270 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.3 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 807 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 682 cases)
Sale deed (in 574 cases)
Postal receipt (in 543 cases)
Tax receipt (in 530 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 7721
Defendant Won: 6453

6453

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

32%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs often failed due to non-payment of batta required for processing their petitions.

Found in 32 cases (32%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Provided

Many petitions were dismissed due to plaintiffs failing to present sufficient evidence to support their claims.

Found in 28 cases (28%) Medium Impact

Failure to Take Action

Plaintiffs frequently did not take necessary steps, such as issuing notices, leading to dismissal of their cases.

Found in 22 cases (22%) Medium Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

Numerous cases were dismissed due to the absence of the petitioner during court proceedings.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Provided

Failure to Take Action

Absence of the Petitioner

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?