| Niyamam AI

Displaying 10256 - 10260 of 15270

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between M/s Bharathy Auto Finance vs Subair regarding money

Civil Suit

Original Suit No. 15 OF 2019

Tirur

2019-07-04

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Secretary, Perumanna Klari Service Co-operative Bank Limited vs Muhammad Rafeek et al regarding loan recovery

Execution Petition

EP 122/2018

Malappuram

2019-07-04

1 years, 0 months, 12 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Secretary, Perumanna Klari Service Co-operative Bank vs Muhammad Ashraf Podiyengal et al regarding default in execution of decree.

Execution Petition

EP 218/2018

Malappuram

2019-07-08

0 years, 9 months, 11 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between secratary vs Sunilkumar Kalan et al regarding decree satisfaction

Execution Petition

EP 396/2018

Tirur, Malappuram

2019-07-08

0 years, 6 months, 18 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between T. Muhammed Ashraf et al vs Painingal Muhammedkutty regarding eviction of shop room

Rent Control

RENT CONTROL PETITION No. 25 OF 2004

Tirur

2019-07-08

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,270 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.3 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 807 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 682 cases)
Sale deed (in 574 cases)
Postal receipt (in 543 cases)
Tax receipt (in 530 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 7721
Defendant Won: 6453

6453

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

25%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs failed to pay the necessary batta, resulting in various petitions being dismissed for default.

Found in 25 cases (25%) Medium Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Plaintiffs were unable to provide sufficient evidence to support their claims, leading to dismissals.

Found in 24 cases (24%) Medium Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

Cases were dismissed due to the petitioner's absence during hearings, failing to represent their interests.

Found in 21 cases (21%) Medium Impact

Failure to Take Steps

Plaintiffs often did not take necessary procedural steps, such as issuing notices, resulting in case dismissals.

Found in 19 cases (19%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Absence of the Petitioner

Failure to Take Steps

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?