| Niyamam AI

Displaying 10091 - 10095 of 15270

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Kunhahammed vs Kunhimuhammed Haji regarding Injunction

Injunction

Original Suit No. 307 OF 2018

Tirur

2019-08-02

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Peringottukara Yogakshema Sabha vs K.P.Saidalavi et al regarding EP 27/2018

Execution Petition

KLML130000762018

Malappuram

2019-08-02

1 years, 6 months, 8 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Markentile Co-operative Society vs Vinod et al regarding Loan closure and execution petition

Execution Petition

EP 61/2018

Tirur, Malappuram

2019-08-02

1 years, 5 months, 0 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Moideenkutty Palara et al vs Hamzakutty et al regarding Partition.

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 178 OF 2019

2019-08-01

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Perumanna Klari Service Sahakarana Bank No.F.770 vs Gireesh Elayat regarding EP dismissal.

Execution Petition

EP 83/2017

Malappuram

2019-08-01

2 years, 4 months, 28 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,270 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.3 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 807 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 682 cases)
Sale deed (in 574 cases)
Postal receipt (in 543 cases)
Tax receipt (in 530 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 7721
Defendant Won: 6453

6453

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

23%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs failed to pay the required court fees, leading to case dismissal for default.

Found in 23 cases (23%) High Impact

Absence of the Plaintiff

Cases were dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence during court proceedings.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Lack of Evidence Submitted

Plaintiffs did not provide sufficient evidence to support their claims, resulting in case dismissal.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

Plaintiffs failed to take required procedural steps, such as issuing notices, leading to dismissals.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Absence of the Plaintiff

Lack of Evidence Submitted

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?