| Niyamam AI

Displaying 10061 - 10065 of 15270

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Vijaya Bank et al vs Jithesh.V.P. regarding realization of money

Original Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 262 OF 2018

Tirur

2019-09-28

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Vijaya Bank, Rep. By its Branch Manager vs Sumithra.T.P., Kurian Mathew regarding realization of money.

Original Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 302 OF 2018

2019-09-28

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Haneefa vs Mammu et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 393 OF 2005

Tirur

2019-09-28

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Parapadikkal Muhammedkutty et al vs Sainudheen regarding Mandatory Injunction and Arrears of Rent

Injunction

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 106 OF 2018

2019-09-30

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Yoonas Abdul Rasakh, Yasikh Abdul Rasakh vs Puzhankarayillath Muhammed Mansoor regarding eviction under the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act.

Rent Control Petition

RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 36 OF 2018

TIRUR

2019-09-30

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,270 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.3 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 807 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 682 cases)
Sale deed (in 574 cases)
Postal receipt (in 543 cases)
Tax receipt (in 530 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 7721
Defendant Won: 6453

6453

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

25%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Required Fees

Plaintiffs failed to pay necessary fees, leading to dismissal for default.

Found in 25 cases (25%) High Impact

Absence of Evidence Provided

Lack of evidence to support claims led to case dismissals.

Found in 24 cases (24%) High Impact

Failure to Take Procedural Steps

Plaintiffs did not take necessary actions, such as issuing notices, resulting in case dismissal.

Found in 23 cases (23%) High Impact

Default Due to Petitioner Absence

Absence of the petitioner in court proceedings resulted in multiple case dismissals.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Required Fees

Absence of Evidence Provided

Failure to Take Procedural Steps

Default Due to Petitioner Absence

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?