| Niyamam AI

Displaying 10031 - 10035 of 15270

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Erachampatt Haleema vs M.Sreenivasan regarding eviction under Section 11 (3) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965

Rent Control Petition

RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 44 OF 2016

Tirur

2019-09-24

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Muhammad Ali vs Salim. A.K regarding null

Criminal Case

ST 195/2017

Tirur,Malappuram

2019-09-24

1 years, 9 months, 1 days

Unknown

View Full Details

Case between Vijayam vs Parameswaran regarding money.

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No.119 OF 2018

Tirur Taluk

2019-09-23

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Gopakumari vs Gopalan et al regarding Partition

Original Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 279 OF 2015

Tirur Taluk

2019-09-25

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Secretary vs Ali Kannamballi et al regarding loan satisfaction

Execution Petition

KLML130000372019

Tirur, Malappuram

2019-09-25

0 years, 8 months, 14 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,270 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.3 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 807 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 682 cases)
Sale deed (in 574 cases)
Postal receipt (in 543 cases)
Tax receipt (in 530 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 7721
Defendant Won: 6453

6453

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

34%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Failure to Provide Necessary Evidence

Plaintiffs failed to supply sufficient evidence to support their claims or demonstrate the means of the respondents.

Found in 34 cases (34%) High Impact

Non-Payment of Required Fees

Petitioners often failed to pay necessary fees, such as batta, leading to dismissal for default.

Found in 26 cases (26%) High Impact

Failure to Take Required Steps

Plaintiffs routinely did not take necessary procedural steps, such as issuing notices to defendants or representing themselves.

Found in 22 cases (22%) Medium Impact

Absence of the Petitioner in Court

Many cases were dismissed due to the petitioner's absence during hearings, impacting their ability to argue their case.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Failure to Provide Necessary Evidence

Non-Payment of Required Fees

Failure to Take Required Steps

Absence of the Petitioner in Court

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?