| Niyamam AI

Displaying 9726 - 9730 of 15270

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Joseph @ Jose et al vs Paulose et al regarding compromise agreement

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 250/2019

PERUMBAVOOR

2025-03-24

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Soman vs M.C. Vinayan et al regarding injunction and compensation

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 17/2019

Perumbavoor

2025-03-22

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Parvathy Ammal (Died), Bhageeradhi Ammal et al vs Kunjumol Thankappan regarding payment of ₹. 50,000/-

Execution Petition

E.P. No. 50/2023

2025-03-22

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between P.G. Govindan Nair vs Kousalya et al regarding petition not pressed.

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 412/2016

2025-03-21

Dismissed

View Full Details

Case between Satheedevi vs Balakrishnan @ Gopalakrishnan et al regarding boundary fixation and injunction

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 188/2019

2025-03-21

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,270 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.3 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 807 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 682 cases)
Sale deed (in 574 cases)
Postal receipt (in 543 cases)
Tax receipt (in 530 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 7721
Defendant Won: 6453

6453

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

34%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Failure to Provide Evidence

Plaintiffs consistently failed to present sufficient evidence regarding the means of respondents or to support their claims.

Found in 34 cases (34%) High Impact

Non-Payment of Batta

Many petitions were dismissed due to the plaintiffs' failure to pay necessary court fees or batta for processing.

Found in 25 cases (25%) Medium Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

Petitioners often failed to appear in court, leading to the dismissal of their cases for lack of representation.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Lack of Notification Steps

Dismissals frequently occurred due to plaintiffs not taking necessary steps to issue notices to respondents.

Found in 14 cases (14%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Failure to Provide Evidence

Non-Payment of Batta

Absence of the Petitioner

Lack of Notification Steps

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?