| Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 141 - 145 of 744

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between T.H. Abdul Azeez vs V.S. Salim regarding eviction under Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act.

Rent Control Petition

R.C.P. No. 160/2020

Ernakulam

2024-02-29

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between K. Bhavani vs Sri. A.J. Shaji regarding eviction.

Rent Control Petition

R.C.P. No. 175/2021

Ernakulam

2024-01-04

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Jagadeepan vs Mulanthuruthy Grama Panchayath regarding lease and rent control

Rent Control Petition

R.C.P. No.131/2021

Ernakulam

2024-01-03

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between K. Krishnakumar vs Prince Edasserry regarding eviction

Eviction

R.C.P. No. 176/2021

Ernakulam

2024-01-04

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between O.C. Alexander vs Shyam Krishna K.R. regarding Rent Control

Rent Control Petition

R.C.P. No.184/2022

Ernakulam

2024-01-11

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

79%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 744 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 2.2 years

Settlement Likelihood 10%

Common Winning Factors:

Lawyer Notice (in 103 cases)
Commission Report (in 97 cases)
Lawyer's Notice (in 94 cases)
Postal receipt (in 79 cases)
Acknowledgment card (in 77 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 591
Defendant Won: 126

126

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

35%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Absence of Plaintiff or Counsel

Plaintiff was consistently absent during hearings with no representation, leading to default dismissals.

Found in 35 cases (35%) High Impact

Petitioners Failed to Press Claims

Many cases were dismissed because petitioners' counsel chose not to press the petitions or requests.

Found in 29 cases (29%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence or Proof

Plaintiffs often failed to provide necessary evidence or prove their claims, resulting in dismissal.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Failure to Comply with Court Requirements

Several cases were dismissed due to non-compliance with statutory requirements or procedural obligations.

Found in 10 cases (10%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Absence of Plaintiff or Counsel

Petitioners Failed to Press Claims

Lack of Evidence or Proof

Failure to Comply with Court Requirements

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?