Private Individual

Keerthi Hire Purchase and Credits Ltd, represented by Manager Mr. John Mathai, accused Kanakarani Mani of an offence under the Negotiable Instruments Act. The matter was settled and the complaint was dismissed.

Kottayam Vyapari Vyavasai Co-operative Society Ltd. is the decree holder, and Jyothivas A K, Adam Bava, and Padmakumar P N are the judgment debtors. The court dismissed the petition for default due to the absence of the decree holder.

Nattakom Service Co-operative Bank No. 3839 represented by its Secretary P.Sheeba is the plaintiff, while Vishnu.K.V is the defendant. The case involves an execution petition that was closed due to no steps taken to attach the property.

The case involves NATTAKOMSERVICE CO OP SOCIETY NO 3839 as the decree holder and VISHNU K V as the judgment debtor. The court has noted that no steps were taken to attach the property.

Nattakom Service Cooperative Bank No.3839 is the decree holder, represented by secretary P. Sheeba. Narayanan NR is the judgment debtor.

Nattakom Service Co-Opertive filed an execution petition against Narayanan N.R. regarding the enforcement of a decree. The court considered the petition and determined that no steps were taken to proceed.

Kottayam Vyapari Vyavasai Co-operative society Ltd. filed an execution petition against Abraham Jose and others in relation to a decree. The court recorded full satisfaction of the execution petition.

The plaintiff, Canara Bank, has filed a suit for the realisation of money due from the defendants arising out of a loan transaction. The defendants, a group of individuals and a private agricultural concern, defaulted on the repayment of the loan.

The plaintiff, Preethy Agencies, sued the defendant, Ammas Enterprises, to recover an amount of ₹85,180/- for products returned. The plaintiff claims the defendant failed to pay for the returned goods as promised.

The plaintiff, Self Employers Service Society, has filed a suit against the defendants for the realization of a loan amounting to ₹92,666 due to default in repayment. The defendants had executed a Demand Promissory note agreeing to repay the loan with interest but failed to comply.