Private Individual

Nattakom Service Cooperative Bank No 3839, represented by Secretary P.Sheeba, filed execution proceedings against Pushpa John and others. The court dismissed the execution petition due to non-compliance with procedural steps.

This case involves Self Employers Leasing & Finance Ltd suing Mr. Muhammed Raffi and others. The court ultimately rejected the plaint due to absence of representation and lack of proper documentation.

Padminiamma filed a restoration petition to set aside an ex-parte decree due to health issues and inability to file a written statement. The respondent, Urayma Devaswom Board, objected to the petition.

P K Kurian petitioned against Keerthi Hier Purchase and Credits Limited and K V Sebastian. The case was dismissed as not pressed.

The plaintiff, Self Employer’ s Service Society, filed a suit against the defendants for recovery of money related to a loan sanctioned to the first defendant. The defendants defaulted on the repayment, leading to the plaintiff seeking legal relief.

Usha Kunjumon filed a suit against Kelamangalam Financiers and Investors and its partners for the recovery of a deposit amounting to Rs. 1,70,377. The defendants failed to return the deposited amount after the maturity of the fixed deposit.

The case involves Nattakom service Cooperative Bank as the decree holder and Shanu Mathew along with Raju John and Preenu Mariyam John as judgment debtors. The court decided to close the execution petition as no steps were taken.

The case involves the Bank of Maharashtra as the plaintiff and Eldho Mathew Roy as the defendant. The plaintiff filed a memo indicating that they do not wish to pursue the suit further.

The case involves the Co operative Departmental Employees Co operative Society Ltd No K 294 seeking enforcement of a decree against Om Praseed K R and Anish K Nair. The court has closed the execution petition after receiving the attached salary of the judgment debtor.

Lithin Jacob and T T Jacob are the plaintiffs seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against Sajimon T K, T K Varghese, Pampady Grama Panchayath, and Remani Mathai. The case revolves around a disputed pathway claimed by the plaintiffs to be their property, while the defendants assert it is a public road.