Bank

Nattakom service Cooperative Bank is the decree holder and Kamalamma C.K. along with others are the judgment debtors. The court has closed the Execution Petition as the necessary steps were taken against the immovable property.

The plaintiff, Canara Bank, has filed a suit for the realisation of money due from the defendants arising out of a loan transaction. The defendants, a group of individuals and a private agricultural concern, defaulted on the repayment of the loan.

The plaintiff, Bank of Baroda, provided a vehicle loan to the defendant, Mr. Madhu K.K, who failed to repay the amount. The court found in favor of the plaintiff due to lack of evidence from the defendant.

Kerala Gramin Bank as the decree holder initiated an execution petition against the judgment debtors Chandrababu K.C. and Abdul Manaf. The court closed the petition due to the absence of the decree holder's representation and a valuation statement.

This case involves Reshma George as the plaintiff and H D F C Bank as the defendant. The suit was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiff.

The plaintiff, State Bank of India, filed a suit against the defendant, Anil Kumar A D, for recovery of a loan amount. The defendant failed to repay the loan taken for purchasing a vehicle, leading to the present action by the bank.

The Bank of Maharashtra Kottayam filed a suit against the Ashraya Kerala JLG/SHG Unit no 727/20 and other related parties. The court ultimately dismissed the suit due to the absence of the plaintiff.

The plaintiff, Kerala Gamin Bank, is seeking to recover a loan amount from the defendants, Aswani Elsa Raju and Rajan K P. The case involves failure to repay a loan of Rs. 75,000/- that was taken out in 2016.

M/s. HDFC Bank Ltd. filed a complaint against Kamarudeen alleging an offence under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The complainant was absent during the proceedings, leading to the dismissal of the case.

Nattakom Service Co Operative Bank is the decree holder while Shaji S R and others are the judgment debtors. The execution petition was considered and the court decided to close it due to the absence of both parties.