Bank

The case involves the State Bank of India as the Decree Holder and Shibu Kumar.G. as the Judgment Debtor. The Execution Petition was dismissed for default due to the absence of both parties.

The plaintiff bank is seeking to recover an outstanding loan amount from the defendants, who had availed a cash credit facility. The defendants failed to repay the loan, leading to legal action being initiated by the bank.

Canara Bank is the Plaintiff represented by its Manager, Athul Mohan. The Defendants are Bindhya.M.Ravi and Raveendran.S., related as daughter and father, respectively, regarding the execution of a decree.

Canara Bank filed an execution petition against Simi.T. and others for enforcement of a decree. The court dismissed the petition for default as the decree holder was absent.

The plaintiffs, Chandrasenan and Sunil Lal, have filed a petition against the SNDP Sakha Yogam No.655 and its members regarding the management of property and financial decisions. They allege that the defendants failed to convene necessary meetings and acted without proper authority.

The case involves Salman Faris as the petitioner challenging an exparte decree against him. The respondents include The South Indian Bank Ltd and two family members of the petitioner.

The Federal Bank Ltd filed a suit for the realisation of money. The matter was settled and the suit was dismissed as not pressed.

N.Sundaresan filed a petition against Indian Bank for a temporary injunction to prevent the bank from recovering an alleged overcharged loan amount. The plaintiff claimed that the bank's demand for Rs.2,19,292 was illegal since he only borrowed Rs.35,992.

The petitioner, Branch Manager of Canara Bank, filed a petition to restore the suit due to lack of action on the part of the petitioner. The court found no steps taken to proceed with the case and dismissed the petition.

The plaintiff, Kerala Gramin Bank, filed a suit for realization of money. The case was heard on 10.04.2025.