Municipality

Mokim Ali is the plaintiff seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the Kochi Municipal Corporation. The plaintiff fears illegal eviction from the property they are leasing to conduct a scrap collection business.

The plaintiffs are seeking a declaration and a permanent prohibitory injunction regarding their easement rights over a strip of land needed for access to their property. The case involves multiple parties, including the State of Kerala and various governmental bodies.

Rajakumari @ Sarada and others filed a petition to restore a suit dismissed for default. The suit concerns a mandatory injunction to remove illegal constructions put up by the defendants.

Sushama A.D. is the plaintiff seeking to amend the plaint in her ongoing suit for permanent prohibitory injunction. The defendants are state entities accused of encroaching on the plaintiff's property.

Kuppayandi Pillai, the petitioner, is seeking eviction of Aravindakshan Nair, the respondent, from a building that collapsed in 2008. The petitioner claims bona fide need for the property to expand their business.

The plaintiff, Sajeevan, is seeking a mandatory injunction against the defendants for alleged violations of the Kerala Municipality Building Rules regarding construction. The defendants include Ratheesh and the Corporation of Kochi, who argued that the suit is not maintainable under the Kerala Municipality Act.

The plaintiffs include Mani P.R @ Maniappan and others who filed a suit against Kalamassery Municipality and the State of Kerala. The court dismissed the suit for default due to the absence of the plaintiffs and their counsel.

Sasikala G. Shenoy filed a petition for eviction against Peter Shyju V.A. and Rajesh Manchanda under the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965. The court dismissed the petition as not pressed in the hearing.

The plaintiff, M.K.Crown, claims ownership of certain property and is seeking a declaration and injunction against the defendants, including Thrikkakara Muncipality, who issued directives affecting his property rights. The defendants argue that the property in question is a public pathway and seek dismissal of the suit.

The plaintiffs are seeking a mandatory and permanent injunction against the defendants regarding noise and food smell from a restaurant. They request the appointment of an Advocate Commissioner to inspect the property and assess the situation.