Similar Cases
Based on: RP.No.10/2025 — Case between Gilbert vs Shyla Praveen regarding setting aside exparte order
48 matching cases found, ranked by shared legal context
EA No.151/2022 in EP No.184/2018
Case between Siras vs Viswambharan et al regarding petition under U/S 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Siras, the petitioner and judgment debtor, is involved in a case against Viswambharan, the decree holder, and two government officials. The petition was dismissed for default as the petitioner was absent and no representation was made.
Civil Case
Defendant Won
EA. 323/2023
Case between Sree Gokulam Chits and Finance Company vs Rajeev regarding petition for adjudication.
Sree Gokulam Chits and Finance Company filed a petition against Rajeev for proper adjudication. The court allowed the petition due to the absence of representation from both parties.
Civil Case
Plaintiff Won
EA No. 153/2023 in EP No.67/2021
Case between Canara Bank vs Kishore Kumar regarding Petition filed by Decree Holder.
This case involves Canara Bank as the petitioner and Kishore Kumar as the respondent. The petition was dismissed for default due to the absence of the Decree Holder.
Civil Case
Defendant Won
EP. No. 186/2024
Case between Muthoot Microfin Ltd vs Sulabha regarding EP dismissal for default.
Muthoot Microfin Ltd filed an Execution Petition against Sulabha for enforcement of a decree. The court dismissed the EP for default as no fresh steps were taken.
Civil Case
Defendant Won
EP.No. 30/2024
Case between Murunthal Service Cooperative Bank Ltd et al vs Gopakumar et al regarding dismissal of petition for default.
The decree holder is the Murunthal Service Cooperative Bank Ltd represented by its secretary in charge, P.A. Sreejit. The judgment debtors are Gopakumar and Raja Lekshmi, and the petition filed by the decree holder was dismissed for default due to their absence.
Civil Case
Defendant Won
RP.30/2024
Case between Krishna Dileep et al vs Sajith Kumar et al regarding Petition.
The case involves petitioners Krishna Dileep and Vishnu Dileep against respondents Sajith Kumar and others regarding a petition. The petition was allowed by the court.
Civil Case
Plaintiff Won
EP.No. 176/2024
Case between Muthoot Microfin Ltd vs Ancy. S. regarding petition under Order XXI Rule 10 & 11
This case involves Muthoot Microfin Ltd as the decree holder and Ancy. S. as the judgment debtor. The petition filed by the decree holder was dismissed for default due to the absence of the decree holder.
Civil Case
Defendant Won
EP.No. 175/2024
Case between M/s. Muthoot Microfin Ltd. vs Pushpamma regarding petition under Order XXI Rule 10 and 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
M/s. Muthoot Microfin Ltd. filed a petition against Pushpamma under the Code of Civil Procedure. The court dismissed the petition due to the decree holder's absence and non-compliance with the order.
Civil Case
Defendant Won
EP.No. 174/2024
Case between M/s.Muthoot Microfin Ltd vs Beena Devi regarding Petition for enforcement of a decree
M/s.Muthoot Microfin Ltd filed a petition as Decree holder against Beena Devi as Judgment Debtor. The petition was dismissed for default due to the absence of the Decree holder.
Civil Case
Defendant Won
EP.No. 47/2023
Case between Mohanan vs Baiju regarding petition under Order XXI Rule 10 & 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure
The decree holder is Mohanan, and the judgment debtor is Baiju. The case involves a petition filed by the decree holder under specific rules of the Code of Civil Procedure, but both parties were absent during the hearing.
Civil Case
Defendant Won
RP. 231/2025
Case between Sajan Aboobaker et al vs Harilal regarding petition allowance
Sajan Aboobaker and others filed a petition against Harilal. The court allowed the petition as there was no objection from the respondent.
Civil Case
Plaintiff Won
EP.No. 142/2020
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Usha regarding decree execution.
Kerala Gramin Bank is the decree holder and Usha is the judgment debtor. The court has heard the petition for decree execution and noted that the decree has been satisfied.
Civil Case
Plaintiff Won
PLP Case No. 12968/2023
Case between Muthoot Microfin Ltd vs Bindhu regarding EP.No. 201/2024
Muthoot Microfin Ltd filed a petition against Bindhu for non-compliance with a previous order. The petition was dismissed for default due to the absence of the decree holder.
Civil Case
Defendant Won
RC (OP) No. 32/2024
Case between Saju Mathai vs Gopakumar regarding key surrender
Saju Mathai filed a petition against Gopakumar regarding the surrender of a key. The petitioner requested the court to hand over the key to him.
Civil Case
Plaintiff Won
EA. 232/2024
Case between Indian Bank vs Seenath Unnisa regarding petition under Order 9 Rule 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure
This case involves Indian Bank as the petitioner and Seenath Unnisa as the respondent. The petition was filed under Order 9 Rule 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and it was dismissed for default.
Civil Case
Defendant Won
RP.No.274/2024
Case between Haridasan Potty vs Vedikunnu Balaganapathy Temple et al regarding application to restore suit
Haridasan Potty, the petitioner/plaintiff, filed a petition to restore a suit that was previously ordered to be dismissed. The respondents remained absent despite notice.
Original Suit
Plaintiff Won
RP.No.283/2024
Case between Rani Chandrika vs Aneesh regarding setting aside an order
Aneesh, the original defendant, filed a petition to set aside an order in a previous case. Rani Chandrika, the original plaintiff, had not taken any steps in the matter.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
RP.No.204/2024
Case between Jayachandran Nair @ Jayachandran vs M/s.Canara Bank regarding review of a previous petition.
The petitioner, Jayachandran Nair, filed a petition to review a previous order related to a civil matter. The respondents are M/s.Canara Bank, represented by their branch manager.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
RP.No.23/2024
Case between Prasanna.P.L vs Shajimon.J regarding setting aside an exparte decree
The petitioner is Shajimon.J, represented by Santha Kumary.S, seeking to set aside an exparte decree against him. The respondent is Prasanna.P.L, the original plaintiff.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
RP.No. 225/2024
Case between Branch Manager, Indian Bank vs Anila Anilkumar regarding restoration of suit
The petitioner is the Branch Manager of Indian Bank, and the respondent is Anila Anilkumar. The petition was filed to restore a suit that was previously dismissed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
RP.No. 90/2023
Case between Branch Manager, Canara Bank vs Syam Krishnan.G., Gopalakrishnan regarding restoration of suit.
The case involves a petition by the Branch Manager of Canara Bank to restore a suit that was previously filed. The respondents in this case are Syam Krishnan.G. and Gopalakrishnan.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
RP.No.140/2023
Case between John.K.J vs Sister Vinni Vetkkattel et al regarding review of order.
John.K.J is the petitioner seeking a review of a prior order. The respondents include Sister Vinni Vetkkattel and others associated with health services.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
RP.No.178/2024
Case between Sasikumar vs Sudarsanan regarding review of order.
Sasikumar, the proprietor of SK Holo Bricks, is the review petitioner. Sudarsanan is the review respondent. The petition was filed to review an earlier order, but it was dismissed for default.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
RP.No.215/2024
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Babu Sathyanandam et al regarding restoration of RP.
The petitioners/defendants are Babu Sathyanandam and Sajeev, while the respondent/plaintiff is Kerala Gramin Bank. They filed a petition to restore a revision petition on file.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
RP.No.268/2024
Case between Arun.S et al vs Sajeev.K et al regarding setting aside an order
The petitioners, Arun.S and Saraswathy, filed a petition to set aside an order dated 23-10-24 and restore the suit. The respondents include Sajeev.K and others, all hailing from Thazhuthala Cherry, Kottiyam.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
RP.No. 223/2024
Case between Madanan Pillai.T. vs Vijayakumari.B. regarding review of an order.
Madanan Pillai.T. filed a review petition against an earlier order. The case involves issues relating to the review of the order dated 29/08/2024.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
RP.No. 191/2024
Case between Branch Manager, Indian Bank vs Sajayan.M regarding restoration of suit
The case involves a petition filed by the Branch Manager of Indian Bank to restore a suit. The respondent is Sajayan.M, who was not represented in court.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
RP.No. 220/2024
Case between Mahadevar (Minor), Anandavaleeswaram Devaswom et al vs Santhosh Kumar regarding setting aside an exparte decree.
Santhosh Kumar is the petitioner/defendant seeking to set aside an exparte decree passed against him. The plaintiffs include Mahadevar (Minor) and others, who are associated with the Anandavaleeswaram Devaswom and Travancore Devaswom Board.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
RP.No.29/2025
Case between Bank of Baroda vs M/s. Charms Beauty Parlour et al regarding setting aside an order.
The case involves Bank of Baroda as the petitioner and M/s. Charms Beauty Parlour and its proprietor as respondents. The petitioner seeks to set aside a previous order and restore a related petition.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
RP.No.233/2024
Case between Uma Maheswari et al vs Syamala Kumari.K regarding setting aside exparte decree
The petitioners/defendants are seeking to set aside an ex parte decree from June 7, 2022. They argue that they could not appear due to COVID-19 restrictions and only learned of the decree following the death of the original plaintiff.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
RP.No.284/2024
Case between Saraswathy vs B.Vinod regarding restoration of the suit
Saraswathy is the plaintiff who filed a petition to restore a suit, while B.Vinod is the defendant. The court decided to allow the plaintiff to proceed with the case.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
RP.No.26/2025
Case between Branch Manager, Indian Bank vs Sajayan.M regarding restoration of suit
This case involves a petition filed by the Branch Manager of Indian Bank to restore a suit that was previously dismissed. The respondent remained exparte during the proceedings.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
RP.No.06/2024
Case between Policarp et al vs George Joseph et al regarding setting aside the order dated 29-09-2023.
The case involves the petitioners Policarp and Jetrud seeking to set aside a prior order and restore their suit. The respondents include George Joseph, Usha Job, Stanley Vincent, and Muthu Mani.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
RP.No.180/2024
Case between State Bank of India vs Jyothi Sudhakar et al regarding restoration of a suit.
The case involves the State Bank of India seeking to restore a suit that had been previously dismissed. The respondents did not file objections or take steps, leading to the dismissal of the petition.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
RP.No.30/2025
Case between Sebastian et al vs Joy @ Ajeeriyos et al regarding restoring the suit
The case involves the petitioners Sebastian and Renju seeking to set aside an earlier order and restore their suit against the respondents Joy and Shijil. The petition was dismissed for default due to no steps taken towards the respondents.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
RP.No.89/2023
Case between Vijaya Bank now Bank of Baroda vs Ajitha regarding restoration of suit.
This case involves Vijaya Bank now Bank of Baroda as the petitioner/plaintiff and Ajitha as the respondent/defendant. The petitioner seeks to restore a suit that was previously ordered to be dismissed.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
RP.No.153/2024
Case between Sujatha vs Selvan regarding restoration of suit
Sujatha filed a petition to restore a suit, alleging necessity under procedural rules. Selvan is the respondent in this case.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
RP.No.100/2025
Case between A.Aloysius vs Sindhu.S et al regarding setting aside an earlier order
A.Aloysius, the petitioner, filed a petition to set aside an order dated 09-06-2025. The court dismissed the petition for default due to no fresh steps being taken.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
RP.No.69/2025
Case between Binu.V. vs Syamkumar regarding review of prior order
Binu.V. filed a review petition to challenge a prior order while Syamkumar is the responding party. The court has allowed the petition for review without costs.
Review Petition
Plaintiff Won
RP.No.153/2023
Case between Branch Manager, Indian Bank vs Athulya Anilkumar et al regarding restoration of suit.
The petitioner is the Branch Manager of Indian Bank seeking to restore a suit. The respondents are Athulya Anilkumar and Nisha Anto.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
RP.No.294/2024
Case between Abdul Kharim vs Navas regarding restoration of RP.
Abdul Kharim is the petitioner seeking to restore the RP on file. Navas is the respondent who did not file any objections.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
RP.No.84/2024
Case between Abdul Rasheed vs Dileep regarding restoration of petition.
Abdul Rasheed filed a petition to restore a previous case on file. The petition was dismissed for default due to no fresh steps taken by the respondent.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
RP.No.104/2025
Case between Janeetta vs Sabeena regarding review of order
Janeetta filed a petition to review an earlier order. The court found no steps taken by the respondent and dismissed the petition for default.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
RP.No. 157/2024
Case between Nabeel vs Kerala State et al regarding petition to restore the suit
Nabeel filed a petition to restore the suit that was previously dismissed. The respondents include the Kerala State and various officials from Kollam.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
RP.No. 299/2024
Case between Manu Mohan vs Chithralal et al regarding restoration of RP
Manu Mohan filed a petition to restore the RP on file. The petition was dismissed for default due to no fresh steps being taken.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
RP.No.25/2025
Case between Branch Manager, Canara Bank et al vs Subhadra regarding restoration of a suit
The petitioner is the Branch Manager of Canara Bank seeking to restore a suit. The respondent is Subhadra, who is opposing the petition.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
RP.No. 276/2024
Case between Shiva Prakash vs Thankachi regarding restoration of a petition.
Shiva Prakash filed a petition to restore a previously dismissed case. The court found that justice would be served by allowing the petitioner another opportunity.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
RP.No.169/2024
Case between Nissamudin vs Saifudin et al regarding restoration of the suit
Nissamudin filed a petition to restore a suit that was previously dismissed. The court considered the petition and the circumstances presented.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won