Similar Cases
Based on: OS 100/2020 — Case between Raveendran Nair et al vs Mohanan regarding fixation of boundary, mandatory injunction and permanent prohibitory injunction.
48 matching cases found, ranked by shared legal context
OS 20/2018
Case between M V Chacko vs Maya Sibi et al regarding settlement.
M V Chacko is the plaintiff against defendants Maya Sibi and Sibi regarding a matter that has been settled through mediation. The court has decreed the suit in terms of the mediation agreement.
Original Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS 54/2024
Case between Anilkumar M R vs T.K. Sundaran et al regarding dismissal for default.
Anilkumar M R is the plaintiff in this case, and T.K. Sundaran and T.K. Venkitachalam are the defendants. The case was dismissed for default as the plaintiff submitted no instruction.
Original Suit
Defendant Won
OS 218/2022
Case between Mathew et al vs Jijimon Varghese regarding dismissal for default.
The plaintiffs Mathew and Joy filed a suit against the defendant Jijimon Varghese. The court dismissed the suit for default as the plaintiff was absent and not ready for evidence.
Original Suit
Defendant Won
OS 27/2022
Case between Radha et al vs Rajani regarding suit for default
The plaintiffs, Radha and Ratheesh, are involved in a case against the defendant, Rajani, regarding a suit that was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and not being ready for evidence.
Original Suit
Defendant Won
OS 154/2021
Case between K.Vijayan et al vs Varkey Varghese regarding refund of court fee
K.Vijayan and others are the plaintiffs in this case against Varkey Varghese. The matter was settled in mediation and the entire amount has been paid to the defendant.
Original Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS 5/2022
Case between Roopesh T.S. vs Hynse Aprem regarding compromise petition
The case involves Roopesh T.S. and Hynse Aprem, who are both plaintiffs and defendants in two separate suits. They have reached a compromise, which the court has recorded and decreed.
Original Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No.113/2024
Case between Vaikathappan Nidhi Limited vs Darsana Lenin et al regarding realisation of money.
The plaintiff, Vaikathappan Nidhi Limited, alleges that the defendants defaulted on a loan taken by the first defendant for self-employment, for which the second defendant was a guarantor. The plaintiff seeks to recover the outstanding loan amount along with interest.
Original Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No.137/2024
Case between Vaikathappan Nidhi Limited vs Ragini M et al regarding realisation of money.
The plaintiff, Vaikathappan Nidhi Limited, is seeking to recover a loan amount from the defendants who defaulted on their payments. The defendants took a loan for self-employment but failed to repay as per the agreement.
Original Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS 33/2023
Case between Sreenivasan et al vs Neelakandan Namboodiri et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, Sreenivasan and his wife Ajithakumari, are involved in a suit regarding ownership rights over certain properties in Njeezhoor Village. The first defendant, Neelakandan Namboodiri, is accused of encroaching on the plaintiffs' land and the plaintiffs seek a permanent prohibitory injunction against this.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS 73/2022
Case between Subichan P.K. vs Joseph P.J. et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and mandatory injunction.
Subichan P.K. is the plaintiff, claiming ownership of a road essential for access to his property. The defendants, Joseph P.J. and Thankachan Jose, are accused of obstructing this access and threatening to block the road.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS 182/2021
Case between Nandini et al vs Saalli regarding partition and injunction.
The plaintiffs, Nandini, Vilasini, Ajithakumari V.K., Remani, and Padmini, are sisters of the defendant Saalli, who is the wife of their deceased brother. They filed a suit for partition of the property inherited from their parents, which the defendant was unwilling to partition.
Civil Suit
Partial
OS 182/2021
Case between Nandini et al vs Saalli regarding partition and injunction
The plaintiffs, Nandini, Vilasini, Ajithakumari V.K., Remani, and Padmini, are sisters of the defendant, Saalli, who is the wife of their deceased brother. This suit was filed for partition of inherited property and to prevent the defendant from interfering with the plaintiffs' share.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 312 OF 2016
Case between Kalappattil deceased Kunhimoideen Haji's children vs Kalappattil deceased Kunhimoideen Haji's children regarding partition
The plaintiffs are the children of Kalappattil deceased Kunhimoideen Haji, and they are involved in a partition suit against other children of the same deceased regarding the division of inherited properties. The suit seeks a preliminary decree for partition of the property.
Original Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 42 OF 2014
Case between Suhara vs Ameer Faizal et al regarding fixation of boundary, mandatory injunction, and recovery of possession
Involves Suhara suing Ameer Faizal et al for boundary fixation, mandatory injunction, and recovery of possession. Plaintiff claims ownership of a property purchased from Abdulla, facing disputes over boundaries and rights of way.
Original Suit
Defendant Won
INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION No. 2250 OF 2018
Case between Ullattil Muhammed @ Kunhimon vs Bava regarding partition
Case involves Ullattil Muhammed petitioning for a final decree for partition. The respondent did not respond, and an Advocate Commissioner was deputed to effect division of property.
Original Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 72 OF 2016
Case between Karatt Thandan Valappil Moideenkutty Haji's children vs Karatt Thandan Valappil Moideenkutty Haji's children regarding partition
The plaintiffs are the children of Late Moideenkutty Haji who are seeking a partition of the property inherited from their father. The defendants are also children of Late Moideenkutty Haji and are contesting the partition.
Original Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 23 OF 2016
Case between Rasiya vs Peringattu Thodiyil Aboobacker Vaidyar et al regarding Partition
Rasiya, the plaintiff, is seeking a partition of the properties belonging to her deceased father, Aboobacker. The defendants are Aboobacker's children and relatives who are contesting the claims.
Original Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 375 OF 2017
Case between Sulaikha vs Kadeeja Umma et al regarding declaration and injunction
Sulaikha is the plaintiff claiming ownership over a property originally owned by Kadiyarakath Abullakutty Haji. The defendants, Kadeeja Umma and others, have admitted the plaint claim through their written statement.
Original Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 301 of 2017
Case between C.P.Pocker vs Cholakka Pulikkaparambil Kuttirayu's children regarding Partition.
C.P.Pocker is the plaintiff seeking partition of property originally belonging to Kuttirayu, which has devolved to him and the defendants. The defendants have admitted the plaint claim through their written statement, leading to a judgment on admission.
Original Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 279 OF 2015
Case between Gopakumari vs Gopalan et al regarding Partition
The plaintiff Gopakumari and the defendants, who are her siblings, are involved in a dispute over the partition of inherited property belonging to their deceased mother, Lakshmi. The suit seeks a decree for partition as the plaintiff claims that the defendants, particularly D1, have not managed the property correctly.
Original Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 67 OF 2015
Case between Ayisha vs Muhammedkutty et al regarding declaration and recovery of possession
The case involves Ayisha, the plaintiff, seeking a declaration and recovery of possession of her property that she claims was fraudulently assigned to Muhammedkutty, the deceased original defendant, who created a forged document. After discovering this, she filed the suit to cancel the document and regain control of her property.
Original Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 149/2018
Case between Devadas et al vs Deputy Tahsildhar regarding declaration and granting a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, Devadas and Ambika, purchased properties and sought a declaration against the Deputy Tahsildhar of the Kerala Financial Corporation to prevent the auction of these properties due to earlier encumbrances. The defendants argued the sale deed was not valid and that the properties were rightfully attached for recovery of government dues.
Original Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 446/ 2018
Case between Ravi vs Ashokan et al regarding declaration and consequential permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiffs, Ravi and additional plaintiff Rajani, are siblings suing their brothers Ashokan and Sasi, and sister Remani over property rights following their parents' death. They seek to declare a settlement deed void and partition the property.
Original Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 32/2022
Case between Lipinjan et al vs Lohithan regarding property dispute
The plaintiffs, Lipinjan and others, are involved in a property dispute with the defendant Lohithan. The parties settled their disputes through mediation, and the court has decreed the division of property among the plaintiffs and the defendant.
Original Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 439/2023
Case between Muhammed Gasini et al vs Vaheeda Beevi regarding partition
The case involves a partition of property among the plaintiffs, who are the legal heirs of Mr. Muhammed Sidni, and the defendant, Vaheeda Beevi. The plaintiffs claim their rights over the property after the death of their mother, Mrs. Majida Beevi.
Original Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 93/2023
Case between Muhammed Khalifa et al vs Babu regarding partition of property
Muhammed Khalifa, a minor, is suing Babu for partition of property previously owned by their deceased grandmother, Smt. Subhadra Amma. The plaintiff claims half share of the properties due to his father’s relationship with the plaintiff's mother.
Original Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 05 / 2020
Case between Shabna.K.P vs Khadeejumma et al regarding easement by prescription
The case involves Shabna.K.P claiming prescriptive easement rights over a pathway from the defendants, Khadeejumma and others. The plaintiff asserts prior usage of the path for over 70 years, while the defendants contest the claim.
Original Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO : 357/2021
Case between Prakasini K. vs Kamala et al regarding cancellation of document and partition
Prakasini K. filed a suit against Kamala and others for the cancellation of a partition deed and for partition of certain properties. The parties are siblings disputing their inheritance rights over the property left by their deceased father.
Original Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 546/2017
Case between Madayi Usha et al vs Madayi Sivanandan et al regarding partition of properties
The plaintiffs are Madayi Usha and Madayi Meenakumari, and the defendants include Madayi Sivanandan and others regarding the partition of certain properties. The suit seeks to divide the ownership of properties inherited from their parents.
Original Suit
Partial
OS. No. 232/2017
Case between Sumathi.N vs Sreelatha et al regarding declaration and recovery of possession.
The case involves Sumathi.N, who is seeking a declaration and recovery of possession of property that she claims was improperly sold by her relatives, Sreelatha and Suresh. The defendants allegedly misled her into selling her property and have evicted her without fulfilling promises made to repurchase it for her.
Original Suit
Defendant Won
OS 691/2018
Case between Thressiamma Kunjumon et al vs Pennamma Devasia et al regarding declaration and partition
The plaintiffs, Thressiamma Kunjumon and Mary K A, are seeking a declaration of their rights over certain properties originally owned by their mother, Chinnamma. The defendants, including Pennamma Devasia and others, contest these claims based on various Wills executed by Chinnamma.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 105/2022
Case between Thankappan vs Jineesh.P.U regarding fixation of boundary.
The case involves a dispute between Thankappan and Jineesh.P.U regarding the fixation of boundaries for their respective properties. The plaintiff alleges that the defendant has been attempting to encroach upon his property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS No. 44/2021
Case between Aswathy Jacob vs Nisha Philip et al regarding partition and injunction.
The plaintiff, Aswathy Jacob, is seeking a partition of the properties inherited from their deceased parents along with a permanent injunction against the defendants. The defendants, Nisha Philip, Liju Reeba Varghese, and minor Ira Varghese, contest the admissibility of the injunction and the legitimacy of the inheritance.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS No. 88/2018
Case between Chellappan vs Santha regarding easement by declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction
Chellappan and Ninu are plaintiffs seeking a declaration of easement rights over a property against defendants Santhamma and others. The case involves the use of a pathway for accessing their property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 267/2020
Case between Radha vs Rajappan regarding declaration, permanent prohibitory injunction and mandatory injunction.
This case involves Radha, who claims a right of easement over pathways against defendant Rajappan. The plaintiff contends that the defendant is encroaching on her property and obstructing her access to the Panchayat road.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS No. 169/20
Case between Remani et al vs Manoharan regarding declaration of easement by grant and for permanent prohibitory injunction
This case involves the plaintiffs, who are siblings from the Hindu Ezhava Community, seeking a declaration of their right of easement over a pathway against the defendant. The plaintiffs allege that the defendant has been obstructing their access to this pathway.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No.136/2020
Case between Appachan @ Kuriakose vs Shaji Kurian et al regarding declaration of the easement by grant, permanent prohibitory injunction and mandatory injunction
The plaintiff, Appachan @ Kuriakose, seeks a declaration of his easement rights over a way claimed to be obstructed by the defendants, Shaji Kurian and Jensy Shaji. The defendants contended that the way is part of their property and denied the plaintiff's claims.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No.253/2023
Case between Vijayamma et al vs Kanakan et al regarding partition and permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiffs, Vijayamma, Mani, Ushakumari, and Seenamma, are seeking a partition of the property inherited from their deceased parents against the defendants, Kanakan, Somarajan, Satheesan, and Santhosh. The suit is based on claims of joint possession and co-ownership of the property, which the defendants allegedly failed to partition despite multiple demands.
Civil Suit
Partial
O.S No.159/2016
Case between Sherry V Vakkachan vs Shinoj Xavier, Umesh regarding declaration of sale deed as null and void.
Sherry V Vakkachan filed a suit against Shinoj Xavier and Umesh, seeking a declaration that a sale deed executed by the defendants is null and void. The plaintiff alleges that the defendants induced him to execute the deed through fraudulent means.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No.51/2024
Case between K.P.Abraham vs Eliyamma et al regarding partition
K.P.Abraham filed a suit for partition against his siblings Eliyamma, K.P.Joseph @ Ouseph, Mary Joseph, and K.P. Xavier regarding their father's property. The plaintiff claims he is entitled to 4/5 share of the property after his siblings transferred their shares to him.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No.25/2021
Case between Kamalasanan et al vs Padmanabhan et al regarding declaration of easement by grant and permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, siblings, are seeking a declaration of easement and a permanent injunction against the defendants, who are their relatives. The case revolves around the plaintiffs' right to use a path that connects to their inherited property, which the defendants are trying to obstruct.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O S. 41/2017
Case between Shaji vs Thankappan, Chellamma regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and mandatory injunction
The plaintiff, Shaji, claims a right of way through item No. 3 pathway, which the defendants, Thankappan and Chellamma, have obstructed. The suit involves allegations of illegal obstruction on the pathway leading to the plaintiff's property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O S. 195/2019
Case between P.K.Vijayan et al vs K.P Remanan et al regarding declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiffs, including P.K.Vijayan's legal representatives, are seeking a declaration of easement over a pathway claimed to be obstructed by the defendants K.P Remanan and Usha. The case revolves around the right of passage and usage of the property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O S 4/2021
Case between Ayyappan vs Ambujakshan et al regarding declaration and easement rights.
The plaintiff Ayyappan, aged 71, filed a suit against Ambujakshan and others for obstruction of his easement rights over pathways adjoining their properties. The suit sought declarations and injunctions.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O S.176/2022
Case between Thomasukutty vs Joseph et al regarding partition of property.
The plaintiff, Thomasukutty, is seeking a partition of the property inherited from his deceased mother, Chinnamma Joseph. The defendants are the plaintiff's siblings, and a dispute has arisen over the division of the property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS 76/2024
Case between Sudheerabai C et al vs Shantha K regarding mediation settlement.
The case involves Sudheerabai C and others as plaintiffs against Shantha K as the defendant. The parties reached a settlement through mediation.
Original Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS 24/2025
Case between Vishnu K.Vinod vs Fathima et al regarding lifting of attachment over property
Vishnu K.Vinod filed a petition to lift the attachment on his property claimed by Fathima. The case revolves around the validity of the attachment based on a demand promissory note disputed by the petitioner.
Original Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No.593/2021
Case between Aleyamma @ Ajitha vs Ajith P Markose et al regarding recovery of possession.
The plaintiff, Aleyamma @ Ajitha, is seeking recovery of possession of properties that originally belonged to her deceased father. The defendants are alleged to have illegally possessed these properties.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won