Similar Cases
Based on: Original Suit No 34/2025 — Case between Souda vs Executive Engineer, Secretary, Uralunkal Labour Contract Co-operative Society Limited regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
48 matching cases found, ranked by shared legal context
ORIGINAL SUIT NO 23/2024
Case between KINARULLA PARAMBATH ROOPA et al vs KIZHAKKUM MURI GULIKAN PARIPALANA SAMITHI et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, KINARULLA PARAMBATH ROOPA and others, are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, KIZHAKKUM MURI GULIKAN PARIPALANA SAMITHI and others, to restrain them from trespassing into the plaint A schedule property and interfering with the plaintiffs' possession.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 107/2025
Case between Abdulla Sons Private Limited Company et al vs Aneesh regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
This case involves Abdulla Sons Private Limited Company and its Managing Director P.Ahammed Kutty against Aneesh regarding a dispute over property boundaries and the installation of a no parking board. The plaintiff seeks a permanent injunction to prevent the defendant from obstructing their property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS 31/2025
Case between KANNATEENTAVITA SAROJINI AMMA vs MINI regarding injunction
The plaintiff, KANNATEENTAVITA SAROJINI AMMA, filed a petition against MINI seeking an injunction to prevent her from trespassing and demolishing a shop building on the plaint schedule property. The case involves disputes over property ownership and possession.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO 9/2024
Case between VAZHAYIL KUMARAN vs CHERUPEEDIKAYIL AJMAL et al regarding declaration and injunction
The plaintiff, VAZHAYIL KUMARAN, seeks a declaration of his right to vehicular access through the property of the defendants, CHERUPEEDIKAYIL AJMAL and CHERUPEEDIKAYIL AZEEZ. The plaintiff claims he has an easement right due to an oral agreement with a former owner.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS No. 976/2024
Case between Benny John et al vs Anivrithan regarding temporary injunction
The plaintiffs, Benny John and Reena, sought a temporary injunction against the defendant, Anivrithan, to prevent him from selling a property involved in a disputed sale agreement. The defendant contested the allegations, claiming no such agreement existed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 138/2022
Case between M.R. Gopinadhan Nair vs Secretary Perumbavoor Municipality regarding perpetual injunction and mandatory injunction
The case involves M.R. Gopinadhan Nair as the plaintiff, who is asking for a perpetual and mandatory injunction against the Secretary of the Perumbavoor Municipality and others regarding unauthorized constructions. The plaintiff claims that the defendants have violated building rules and encroached on his property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 1549/2019
Case between Sasi vs Chokli et al regarding Permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, Sasi and Soumini, are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendant, Chokli, who attempted to obstruct their access to a pathway critical for their property. The case was brought due to concerns over the defendant's attempts to encroach on the pathway, impacting the plaintiffs' peaceful possession and enjoyment of their land.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 76/2025
Case between Muhammed Rija P.M vs Thrikkakara Municipality regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Muhammed Rija P.M filed a suit against Thrikkakara Municipality seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction after the municipality removed a business signboard without proper notice. The court found that while the municipality could not act without due process, it could not impose a blanket prohibition on the municipality's actions.
Civil Suit
Partial
O.S. No. 436 of 2022
Case between K.J Thomas et al vs Saumya Maju et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
K.J Thomas and others are plaintiffs seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against Saumya Maju and others. The case concerns excavation activities by the defendants that threaten the plaintiffs' properties.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 545/2024
Case between Soni Francis et al vs Pioneer Nirman India Pvt. (Ltd) et al regarding mandatory injunction
The plaintiffs, Soni Francis and Lizzy Francis, claim their right to an exclusive car parking facility in a property owned by them in Pioneer Towers. They have been denied this right by the defendants, who are involved in managing the property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.972/2025
Case between Dr. Yamuna Prasad vs PRS Krishna Apartment and Commercial Space Owners Welfare Association regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, Dr. Yamuna Prasad and Dr. Asha Prasad, sought a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, the PRS Krishna Apartment and its Secretary, Sajith S. Pillai. The case involves a dispute over the operation of a clinic by the plaintiffs and the defendants' attempts to remove signage related to the clinic.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O. S. No. 315/2025
Case between Sharafudheen vs Nujumudheen regarding temporary injunction
The petitioner Sharafudheen is seeking a temporary injunction against his brother Nujumudheen to prevent him from encroaching on his property. The dispute arises over a pathway and allegations of unauthorized cutting of a new pathway.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS No. 461/2023
Case between Suresh Kumar vs Chicago Constructions International Private Limited et al regarding temporary injunction for unauthorized construction
Suresh Kumar filed a petition against Chicago Constructions International Private Limited and its Managing Director S. Mohanakumar, seeking a temporary injunction to prevent further construction on a property and to remove an unauthorized construction. The case revolves around issues of property possession and encroachment.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 345/2016
Case between Thottathil Pachukutty et al vs Thottathil Sulochana et al regarding recovery of possession of immovable property and mandatory injunction.
The plaintiffs, Thottathil Pachukutty et al, claim ownership over a property from which the defendant, Thottathil Sulochana, allegedly encroached and constructed a house illegally. The case involves disputes over property boundaries and title.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.453/2022
Case between Hathikka KV vs Nisha regarding mandatory injunction and compensation.
Hathikka KV, the plaintiff, filed a suit against Nisha, the defendant, seeking a mandatory injunction to vacate the property used for unauthorized occupation and compensation for damages. The plaintiff claims the defendant has overstayed the agreement terms, and the property is needed for a medical shop.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.175/2018
Case between Lakshmikutty Amma et al vs Kozhikode City Service Co-operative Bank et al regarding declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiffs, a husband and wife, are seeking a declaration regarding their life interest in a property previously settled to their son, the second defendant. They claim that a loan taken by the second defendant against the property was unauthorized as their consent was not obtained.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No.744/2023
Case between Anil. E. P vs Samastha Kerala Jam-Iyyathul Muallimeen Central Council regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Anil. E. P is the plaintiff, seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against Samastha Kerala Jam-Iyyathul Muallimeen Central Council, the defendant. The plaintiff claims to be in possession of a property he leased and accuses the defendant of attempting to evict him unlawfully.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 326/2017
Case between Sasilal P vs Vinod K et al regarding mandatory injunction
The plaintiff, Sasilal P, is seeking a mandatory injunction against the defendants, Vinod K and Kadalundi Gramapanchayath, for allegedly encroaching upon his property and constructing a compound wall. The defendants deny the allegations and assert that the road in question is public property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit Nos. 353/2024
Case between Shibu vs R. Rajagopalakrishnan et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
Shibu is the plaintiff seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against R. Rajagopalakrishnan and others. The case arises from a dispute over property ownership and related claims.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 81/2024
Case between CHORANGAD EECHALI ABU HAJI, BALAKRISHNAN vs VALAYAM GRAMAPANCHAYATH et al regarding suit dismissed as not pressed.
The plaintiffs, CHORANGAD EECHALI ABU HAJI and BALAKRISHNAN, filed a suit against VALAYAM GRAMAPANCHAYATH and the Secretary of the Gramapanchayath. The suit was dismissed as not pressed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 132/2022
Case between Nanu Arettummal vs Narayani Nellikunnummal et al regarding partition and separate possession
Nanu Arettummal, the plaintiff, is seeking partition of the jointly owned property after the death of his father. The defendants are opposing this claim, stating the property is not identifiable and they're not in joint ownership with the plaintiff.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 26/2024
Case between Balan vs Vinil Babu regarding specific performance of a promise
The plaintiffs, Balan and Sarojini, are seeking a decree for specific performance against their son, Vinil Babu, regarding a property gifted to him for securing a loan. The defendant has breached the agreement to reconvey the property upon settling the loan.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 151/2023
Case between ASHOKAN vs THE VATTOLI NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL COMMITTEE et al regarding suit dismissal for default
The plaintiff ASHOKAN filed a suit against THE VATTOLI NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL COMMITTEE and its members. The court dismissed the suit for default due to the plaintiff's absence during the hearing.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT 103/2024
Case between Reena vs Radhakrishnan. P. K et al regarding settlement of suit
Reena, the plaintiff, filed a suit against Radhakrishnan. P. K and others. The matter was settled between the parties through mediation.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT 5/2021
Case between MALAYIL DEVI vs MALOL ASOKAN et al regarding civil dispute
MALAYIL DEVI filed a suit against MALOL ASOKAN and others. The matter has been settled between the parties through mediation.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
EP/90/2025
Case between Kavilumpara Employees And Workers Welfare Co Operative Society vs Jithin PA et al regarding decree debt.
Kavilumpara Employees And Workers Welfare Co Operative Society is the petitioner seeking to recover a decree debt. The respondents have agreed to pay the debt in installments.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT 127/2014
Case between N. P. Padmakumar et al vs Kasthurikuni Moidu Haji et al regarding Permanent Prohibitory and Mandatory Injunction
The plaintiffs are N. P. Padmakumar and others, while the defendants include Kasthurikuni Moidu Haji and others. The case involves allegations of unauthorized construction and trespass on the plaint schedule property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS 127/2014
Case between N. P. PADMAKUMAR et al vs KASTHURIKUNI MOIDU HAJI et al regarding reopening evidence.
N. P. Padmakumar and others are petitioners seeking to reopen evidence in a long-pending case against Kasthurikuni Moidu Haji and others. The petitiioners aimed to mark a photocopy of a plan and permit issued previously.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO 81/2025
Case between Sajith Kokkanneetavida vs Passport Officer regarding declaration of date of birth.
The plaintiff, Sajith Kokkanneetavida, seeks to declare his date of birth as 31.05.1988 instead of 31.05.1983 due to an error in the passport issued by the defendant. The defendant, the Passport Officer, did not appear for the proceedings.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO 22/2024
Case between MUHAMMAD SHAFI vs YASAR regarding realization of money
Muhammad Shafi claims that Yasar borrowed Rs. 2,00,000 and has not repaid it despite promises. The case revolves around the validity of the loan and the obligation to repay it.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
EP/113/2024
Case between Kavilumpara Rural Employees And Workers Welfare Co Operative Society et al vs Satheesan K, Rajeevan K regarding decree debt repayment.
Kavilumpara Rural Employees And Workers Welfare Co Operative Society is involved in a case regarding a decree debt repayment by the respondents. The respondents have agreed to clear off the debt in installments.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS 3/2025
Case between Siddequl Akbar vs Muhammadali et al regarding injunction and mandatory relief.
The case involves Siddequl Akbar who is seeking permanent prohibitory injunctions against Muhammadali and others regarding a vehicle that was allegedly wrongfully taken from his possession. The suit also seeks mandatory relief for the return of the vehicle he purchased under an existing loan agreement.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS 64/2021
Case between KUNHABDULLA vs KUNHALI et al regarding partition of property
KUNHABDULLA, the plaintiff, is seeking a final decree in a partition suit against KUNHALI and other defendants regarding the division of property as per a preliminary decree. The property has been measured, and shares have been allocated to each party as per the court's decision.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 24/2023
Case between ASHOKAN. M. P vs BABY RAJAN et al regarding recovery of possession.
Ashokan M. P filed a suit against Baby Rajan and others for recovery of possession of the plaint B schedule property based on the plaintiff’s title. The cause of action arose on 23-12-2022.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO 123/2024
Case between HAMEED HAJI et al vs VANIYAM VEETIL MUHAMMAD ALI et al regarding perpetual prohibitory injunction
HAMEED HAJI and others are plaintiffs suing VANIYAM VEETIL MUHAMMAD ALI and others for a permanent prohibitory injunction to prevent trespassing into their property and related acts. The case arose due to actions taken by the defendants on 18-11-2024.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No 121/2024
Case between Mundiyott ABOOBACKER vs VANIYAM VEETIL MUHAMMAD ALI et al regarding suit dismissed as not pressed.
Mundiyott ABOOBACKER is the plaintiff in this civil suit. The case involved a dispute leading to the plaintiff not pressing the suit.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 504/2024
Case between Anu K Kurian et al vs Reghunathan T K regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The case involves Anu K Kurian and K A Kurian as plaintiffs seeking a prohibitory injunction against defendant Reghunathan T K. The plaintiffs allege that the defendant has trespassed on their property and installed utilities without permission.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S 347/2022
Case between Thresiamma Philip vs The Chief Manager, The South Indian Bank Ltd. regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Thresiamma Philip filed a suit against The South Indian Bank Ltd. for a permanent prohibitory injunction to restrain the bank from taking possession of her agricultural land. The suit arose due to the bank's claim of possessing the property over a loan that the plaintiff could not repay.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT 132/2024
Case between SHINIL @ DEVASYA @ SHINIL JOSE vs SHEEBA @ MARIYAM @ SHEEBA THOMAS et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The case involves Shinil Jose as the plaintiff claiming that the defendants trespassed into his property and threatened him, affecting his peaceful life. The plaintiff seeks a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO 120/2024
Case between Kunhabdulla vs Vaniyam Veetil Muhammad Ali et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
This case involves Kunhabdulla, the plaintiff, who is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, including Vaniyam Veetil Muhammad Ali, to prevent them from trespassing onto his property for a road widening project. The defendants allegedly entered the property without consent and marked sections they claimed were necessary for the road work.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO 122/2024
Case between RAKHI @ RAGISHA vs VANIYAM VEETIL MUHAMMAD ALI et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiffs, Rakhi @ Ragisha and Kamala, seek a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, including Vaniyam Veetil Muhammad Ali and others, who are alleged to have trespassed into their property to mark for road widening without consent. The plaintiffs contest the defendants' claims of rights over their property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO 124/2024
Case between SURESH vs VANIYAM VEETIL MUHAMMAD ALI et al regarding perpetual prohibitory injunction.
The case involves plaintiffs SURESH and RAHNA seeking a permanent injunction against defendants VANIYAM VEETIL MUHAMMAD ALI, AKHILA MARIYAT, C. K. NAZAR, K. T. K CHANDRAN, NADAPURAM GRAMA PANCHAYATH, and URALUNGAL LABOUR CONTRACT CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. to restrain them from trespassing and committing acts of waste on the plaint schedule property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO 11/2025
Case between BUSHARA vs MUHAMMAD ASHRAF regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
BUSHARA instituted this suit against MUHAMMAD ASHRAF to seek a permanent prohibitory injunction restraining him from trespassing into her property. The plaintiff claims that the defendant threatened her and her family over alleged money transactions with her husband, who is abroad.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO 48/2024
Case between Sujith Thachanandiyil vs Rajeesh. E. K et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, Sujith Thachanandiyil, claims ownership and peaceful possession of a property and seeks an injunction against the defendants, Rajeesh. E. K, Narayani, and Subija, who allegedly trespassed and attempted to dismantle property barriers. The defendants assert they have a right of way through the plaintiff's property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO 3/2024
Case between Sankaran. P. P vs Vijesh et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, Sankaran. P. P, claims ownership of a property that the defendants trespassed into, causing damage and distress. The plaintiff seeks a permanent injunction to prevent further trespassing and damage.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.856/2018
Case between Jayan. K.S et al vs M/s. Tata Motors Finance Ltd et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, Jayan. K.S and Jayakumari Jayan, are a husband and wife facing threats from the defendants, M/s. Tata Motors Finance Ltd and its officers, regarding a loan for a truck. They seek a permanent injunction to prevent the defendants from entering their rented house and making threats related to the loan.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 13/2018
Case between M/s Swapna Bone Meal Co. vs V.J. Joy et al regarding perpetual injunction
M/s Swapna Bone Meal Co. seeks a perpetual injunction against V.J. Joy and others to prevent them from obstructing the operation of the bone meal unit. The defendants claim that the operation is illegal, causing environmental pollution and health risks to nearby residents.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 292/2025
Case between Samson T George et al vs Arun Kumar Karerat et al regarding temporary injunction
This case involves petitioners Samson T George and Babu Mathew seeking a temporary injunction against the respondents Arun Kumar Karerat, Samson Fernandez, Annerine Mildred D’Silva, and MIR Realtors Pvt. Ltd. The petitioners argue that failure to grant the injunction will cause them irreparable harm.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won