| Niyamam AI

Displaying 4136 - 4140 of 22021

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Benny Xavier vs Sunil Eapen regarding temporary prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

O.S No. 469/2024

Ernakulam

2024-08-19

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Sunil E Edathil vs Benny Xavier et al regarding temporary injunction

Injunction

O.S No. 582/2024

Ernakulam

2024-08-19

approximately-0 years 0 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between M/s. Kerala Grammin Bank vs Sameer K.H et al regarding realisation of money

Civil Suit

O.S No. 230/2021

Ernakulam

2024-08-19

approximately-9 years 16 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Vasumathy Sitaram et al vs M.N Sivakumar et al regarding declaration, injunction and cancellation of document

Civil Suit

O.S. No.248/2016

ERNAKULAM

2024-08-19

approximately-8 years

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Surya Vijayan vs Raji et al regarding Permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

O.S. No.806/2023

Ernakulam

2024-08-21

approximately-1 year 11 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9703

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

28%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay necessary fees, leading to case dismissals for default.

Found in 28 cases (28%) Medium Impact

Lack of Evidence Provided

Many cases were dismissed due to plaintiffs not presenting sufficient evidence to support their claims.

Found in 25 cases (25%) Medium Impact

Failure to Take Required Steps

Dismissals occurred repeatedly when plaintiffs did not take necessary procedural steps or respond in a timely manner.

Found in 22 cases (22%) Medium Impact

Non-Presentation of Documents

Plaintiffs often failed to produce essential documents, resulting in an inability to support their cases.

Found in 19 cases (19%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Provided

Failure to Take Required Steps

Non-Presentation of Documents

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?