| Niyamam AI

Displaying 4036 - 4040 of 21981

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Bank of Baroda, Vazhakkala Branch vs Sreejith P.S regarding realization of money.

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 170 /2024

Ernakulam

2024-09-10

approximately-3 years 1 month 3 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between M/s. CONPAC MIX PVT. LTD vs Aleyamma Varghese regarding realisation of money

Civil Suit

O.S No. 249/2024

2024-09-11

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Joseph Martin vs Sreejith N U regarding Rent Control proceedings

Rent Control

R.C.P. No. 135/2023

Ernakulam

2026-01-15

approximately-1 year 2 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Union Bank of India vs M/s Studio New Order et al regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 1335 /2022

Ernakulam

2024-09-12

approximately-3 years 6 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between K P Babu vs Geetha @ Seetha et al regarding injunction

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 1361/2018

Ernakulam

2024-09-13

approximately-6 years 2 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9683

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

22%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Failure to Produce Necessary Evidence

Plaintiffs did not present sufficient evidence to demonstrate the means of respondents to pay the decree debt.

Found in 22 cases (22%) High Impact

Non-Payment of Required Fees

Cases were dismissed due to plaintiffs failing to pay necessary fees for filing or issuing notices.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Lack of Representation in Court

Plaintiffs frequently failed to appear or have legal representation during proceedings.

Found in 17 cases (17%) Medium Impact

Inaction on Issuing Notices

Plaintiffs failed to take necessary steps to issue notices to defendants, resulting in dismissal.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Failure to Produce Necessary Evidence

Non-Payment of Required Fees

Lack of Representation in Court

Inaction on Issuing Notices

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?