| Niyamam AI

Displaying 4021 - 4025 of 21981

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Jaihind Steel Private Limited vs Padipurakkal Hardware regarding amendment of plaint

Civil Suit

O.S.No. 1011 /2019

Ernakulam

2024-09-04

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Pratheesh J R vs Sanilkumar K S regarding Counter Claim for Temporary Injunction

Civil Suit

O.S.No. 1145 /2 023

Ernakulam

2024-09-05

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Pratheesh J R vs Sanilkumar K S regarding temporary injunction

Civil Suit

O.S.No. 1145 /2023

Ernakulam

2024-09-05

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between C.M. Subair vs Salam et al regarding perpetual prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

O.S No. 69/2020

2024-09-05

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Arun A Ravindran vs Sasikanth, Padma R Bhat regarding eviction under the Kerala Buildings Lease & Rent Control Act, 1965.

Rent Control Petition

R.C.P. No. 18/2023

Ernakulam

2024-09-05

approximately-2 years 8 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9683

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

22%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Failure to Produce Necessary Evidence

Plaintiffs did not present sufficient evidence to demonstrate the means of respondents to pay the decree debt.

Found in 22 cases (22%) High Impact

Non-Payment of Required Fees

Cases were dismissed due to plaintiffs failing to pay necessary fees for filing or issuing notices.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Lack of Representation in Court

Plaintiffs frequently failed to appear or have legal representation during proceedings.

Found in 17 cases (17%) Medium Impact

Inaction on Issuing Notices

Plaintiffs failed to take necessary steps to issue notices to defendants, resulting in dismissal.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Failure to Produce Necessary Evidence

Non-Payment of Required Fees

Lack of Representation in Court

Inaction on Issuing Notices

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?