| Niyamam AI

Displaying 3751 - 3755 of 21904

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between The Federal Bank Ltd vs Akhila M. S, Sunilkumar M.T, Sudha V R regarding recovery of money

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 1162/2023

Ernakulam

2024-12-03

approximately-8 years 11 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Lulu International Shopping Malls, Pvt. Ltd vs Ajmil Lailabeevi Kamaludeen et al regarding realization of money.

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 1056/2023

Ernakulam

2024-12-04

approximately-1 year 8 months 0 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between M/s Pulikkal Enterprises vs Trackon Couriers Private Limited regarding a civil suit

Civil Suit

O.S. No.1015 /2022

Ernakulam

2024-12-05

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Union Bank Of India vs Haby T S regarding realization of money.

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 37/2023

Ernakulam

2024-12-04

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Symega Flavours India (p) Ltd vs Nermin Trading Co et al regarding a civil dispute

Civil Suit

O.S No. 1309/2017

Ernakulam

2024-12-06

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9650

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

27%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay necessary fees, leading to dismissal for default.

Found in 27 cases (27%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Many cases were dismissed due to insufficient evidence demonstrating the respondent's means to pay debts.

Found in 24 cases (24%) High Impact

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

Dismissing cases often resulted from plaintiffs not taking necessary legal steps, such as issuing notices.

Found in 21 cases (21%) Medium Impact

Absence of the Plaintiff

Court dismissals occurred when plaintiffs failed to appear during the proceedings.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

Absence of the Plaintiff

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?