| Niyamam AI

Displaying 3691 - 3695 of 21904

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between M/s. Mulamoottil Consumer Credits LTD. vs Santha et al regarding realisation of money.

Civil Suit

OS.No.188/2020

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-01-31

approximately-8 years 2 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

OS.No.315/2023

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-01-31

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction

Civil Suit

OS.No.194/2025

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-01-31

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Debu Raju vs Saritha Suresh regarding arrears of rent

Rent Control Petition

RCP.No.19/2023

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-01-31

approximately-5 years 2 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Asokan vs Jaya Babu, Ramesan K K et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

OS. No.15/2018

2023-01-31

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9650

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

38%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Many petitions were dismissed due to plaintiffs failing to pay necessary court fees or costs.

Found in 38 cases (38%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Plaintiffs frequently failed to present adequate evidence to support their claims or the means of respondents.

Found in 22 cases (22%) Medium Impact

Absence of Petitioner

Numerous petitions were dismissed because the plaintiff was not present during proceedings.

Found in 16 cases (16%) Medium Impact

Failure to Take Steps

Cases were often dismissed as plaintiffs did not take necessary procedural steps, like issuing notices.

Found in 14 cases (14%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Absence of Petitioner

Failure to Take Steps

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?