| Niyamam AI

Displaying 3486 - 3490 of 21904

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between State Bank Of India vs Rajeev.S.R regarding realization of money.

Civil Suit

OS.No.1969/2023

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-03-29

approximately-4 years 4 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Jayasudheer vs Anil kumar regarding realisation of money

Civil Suit

OS. No.1697/2018

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-03-29

approximately-6 years 10 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Padma kumar vs Manju Sajan George regarding realisation of money

Civil Suit

OS. No.1702/2018

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-03-29

approximately-6 years 11 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between State Bank of India vs M/s Choice Garments regarding realization of money.

Civil Suit

OS.No. 1859/2022

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-03-29

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Bhuvanendran vs Soman Nadar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

OS. No.1940/2000

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-03-29

approximately-24 years 6 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9650

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

30%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs failed to pay the required batta for their petitions, leading to dismissal.

Found in 30 cases (30%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Plaintiffs did not provide sufficient evidence to support their claims during court proceedings.

Found in 25 cases (25%) High Impact

Default Due to Absence

Court cases were dismissed because the plaintiffs did not appear or were not represented.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Failure to Issue Notice

Dismissing petitions due to plaintiff's failure to issue necessary notices to respondents.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Default Due to Absence

Failure to Issue Notice

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?