| Niyamam AI

Displaying 3101 - 3105 of 21904

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Dr. Suraj Soman vs Mr.Jayakrishnan regarding temporary injunction

Civil Suit

O.S. No.1333/2025

Thiruvananthapuram

2025-09-29

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Petra Property Development Services Private Limited vs Rajesh Nair regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Injunction

OS.No.1078/2025

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-08-01

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Padmakumar vs R. Biju et al regarding declaration and injunction

Civil Suit

OS. No.1898/2023

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-08-02

approximately-2 years 9 months 1 day

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Abdul Rasheed vs Padmakumar regarding fixed deposit renewal.

Execution Petition

OS.No.1051/2015

Thiruvananthapuram

2025-08-02

approximately-1 year 1 day

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Canara Bank vs Gopika.G.S et al regarding realisation of money

Civil Suit

OS. No.2066/2016

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-08-04

approximately-9 years 2 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9650

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

42%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay necessary fees or batta, leading to case dismissal for default.

Found in 42 cases (42%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Many cases were dismissed due to plaintiffs not providing sufficient evidence to support their claims.

Found in 30 cases (30%) High Impact

Failure to Issue Required Notices

Plaintiffs often failed to issue necessary notices to respondents, resulting in case dismissals.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

Cases were dismissed when the plaintiff failed to appear or represent themselves in court.

Found in 10 cases (10%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Issue Required Notices

Absence of the Petitioner

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?