| Niyamam AI

Displaying 271 - 275 of 21818

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Nizam S et al vs Usha Amma et al regarding fixation of boundary and injunctions

Civil Suit

OS. No. 64/2024

Kollam

2025-07-10

approximately-1 year 9 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Vasanthakumari vs Bindhu regarding attachment of property

Civil Suit

OS 324/2025

Kollam

2025-07-11

approximately-1 year 22 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Soman Pillai vs Radhakrishna Pillai regarding temporary injunction.

Civil Suit

OS 470/2024

Kollam

2025-07-11

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Karmali vs Charles regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

OS. No. 304/2022

Kollam

2025-07-11

approximately-3 years 3 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between G.Prasanth vs K.P.Bhasi regarding partition of property.

Civil Suit

F.D.A. 14/2021 in OSNo. 781/2015

Kollam

2025-07-11

approximately-8 years 1 month

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9608

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

34%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Failure to Provide Necessary Evidence

Plaintiffs did not present sufficient evidence to prove the means of the respondents or the validity of their claims.

Found in 34 cases (34%) High Impact

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Cases were dismissed because the petitioners failed to pay the required batta for processing their petitions.

Found in 30 cases (30%) High Impact

Lack of Representation in Court

Petitioners often failed to appear in court, leading to dismissals for non-representation or absence.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Inadequate Steps Taken in Proceedings

Dismissals occurred due to plaintiffs not taking necessary steps, such as issuing notices to respondents or filing required documents.

Found in 16 cases (16%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Failure to Provide Necessary Evidence

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Representation in Court

Inadequate Steps Taken in Proceedings

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?