| Niyamam AI

Displaying 20291 - 20295 of 21897

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between SML Finance Limited vs Shajahan et al regarding money suit

Money Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 74 OF 2015

Tirur

2017-08-01

2 years

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Kuttan vs Bindu regarding Default Judgment

Execution Petition

EP 139/2017

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-08-02

0 years, 1 months, 16 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Perayil Shahul Hameed vs Muhammadali et al regarding right of way

Civil Suit - Declaration and Injunction

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 82 OF 2016

Tirur

2017-07-31

1 year

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Abdul Razakh vs Muhammed et al regarding injunction

Civil Suit - Injunction

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 302 OF 2015

Tirur

2017-07-31

2 years 8 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Muhammed et al vs Moidu et al regarding injunction

Civil Suit - Injunction

Original Suit No. 326 OF 2016

Tirur

2017-07-31

Not mentioned

Unknown

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9647

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

25%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay the required batta, resulting in case dismissals for default.

Found in 25 cases (25%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence

Many plaintiffs did not present sufficient evidence to support their claims, leading to case dismissals.

Found in 23 cases (23%) High Impact

Failure to Take Steps

The failure to take necessary procedural steps, such as issuing notices, resulted in numerous defaults.

Found in 21 cases (21%) High Impact

Absence of Petitioners

Plaintiffs often failed to appear in court, leading to dismissals for default in representation.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence

Failure to Take Steps

Absence of Petitioners

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?