| Niyamam AI

Displaying 18261 - 18265 of 21957

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between The plaintiff vs Moideenkutty et al regarding EP dismissal for default

Execution Petition

EP 6/2016

Malappuram

2019-07-23

3 years, 7 months, 1 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between secretary vs Velayudhankutty p k et al regarding loan closure

Execution Petition

EP 132/2019

Malappuram

2019-07-23

0 years, 4 months, 10 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Safiya vs Noushad et al regarding declaration

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 243 OF 2017

2019-07-24

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Peringottukara Yogakshema Sabha vs U.V.Shaji et al regarding Execution Proceedings

Execution Proceedings

EP 22/2018

Tirur, Malappuram

2019-07-24

1 years, 6 months, 2 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Ummusalma vs Koorkoli Abdu Haji et al regarding injunction

Injunction

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 44 OF 2017

2019-07-24

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9673

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

21%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Multiple petitions were dismissed for failure to pay necessary batta for case proceedings or notice issuance.

Found in 21 cases (21%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Dismissals occurred frequently due to the plaintiffs' failure to provide evidence of respondents' financial means.

Found in 19 cases (19%) High Impact

Non-Representation of Petitioners

Many cases were dismissed because plaintiffs failed to appear or represent themselves in court.

Found in 17 cases (17%) Medium Impact

Failure to Issue Necessary Notices

Petitions were dismissed due to the lack of action in issuing necessary notices to the respondents.

Found in 16 cases (16%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Non-Representation of Petitioners

Failure to Issue Necessary Notices

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?