| Niyamam AI

Displaying 111 - 115 of 21810

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Jacob.K.Baby et al vs Subhash regarding Eviction

Civil Suit

OS. No. 103/2021

Kollam

2025-12-08

approximately-4 years 6 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Willington vs K.M. Anto et al regarding damages.

Civil Suit

OS. No. 542/2018

Kollam

2025-12-08

approximately-7 years 9 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Canara Bank vs Raj Mohan regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

OS. No. 654/2023

Kollam

2025-12-10

approximately-6 years 25 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between M/s Canara bank vs Ajayan regarding Realisation of Money

Civil Suit

OS. No. 692/2024

Kollam

2025-12-08

approximately-8 years 1 month 21 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Lekshmi Chandra @ Lekshmi Shaji vs P R Prathapa Chandran regarding withdrawal of Rent Control Petition

Rent Control Petition

RC(OP).No. 05/2023

Kollam

2025-12-10

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9603

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

30%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed due to non-payment of required batta fees, leading to automatic dismissal of their petitions.

Found in 30 cases (30%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Submitted

Plaintiffs often did not provide sufficient evidence to prove their claims, resulting in case dismissals.

Found in 25 cases (25%) High Impact

Absence of Petitioners in Court

Many cases were dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiff in court on scheduled dates.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Failure to Issue Notices

Plaintiffs frequently failed to take necessary steps for issuing notices to defendants, leading to dismissals.

Found in 12 cases (12%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Submitted

Absence of Petitioners in Court

Failure to Issue Notices

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?