| Niyamam AI

Displaying 76 - 80 of 21806

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Union Bank of India vs Pooja M Panicker et al regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

OS. No. 503/2024

Kollam

2025-11-26

approximately-10 years 11 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Sheela Shaji vs Biju. G.R regarding realisation of money.

Civil Suit

OS. No. 739/2023

Kollam

2025-11-26

approximately-3 years 4 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Sugathan vs Shyama et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

OS. No. 14/2025

Kollam

2025-11-26

approximately-2 years 4 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Lekshmikutty Amma et al vs Sivasankara Pillai et al regarding partition

Civil Suit

OS.No.53/1987

Kollam

2025-11-27

approximately-35 years 11 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Simi P vs Shibi P regarding realisation of money

Civil Suit

OS. No. 45/2021

Kollam

2025-11-27

approximately-4 years 10 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9602

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

38%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs failed due to not paying the mandatory court fees for processing their petitions.

Found in 38 cases (38%) High Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

Cases were dismissed because the petitioner did not appear in court for hearings.

Found in 28 cases (28%) Medium Impact

Lack of Evidence

Plaintiffs often failed to provide sufficient evidence to support their claims or to prove means.

Found in 25 cases (25%) Medium Impact

No Steps Taken

Petitioners failed to take necessary procedural steps in their cases, leading to dismissals.

Found in 24 cases (24%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Absence of the Petitioner

Lack of Evidence

No Steps Taken

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?