| Niyamam AI

Displaying 426 - 430 of 15062

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between C. M Rosakkutty vs Jofri Mathew et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

O.S No. 124/2024

Pala

2025-07-28

approximately-1 year 5 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Edanadu Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. et al vs Jayasankar V. T et al regarding execution petition.

Execution Petition

EP 174/2023 IN A.R.C NO. 1624/2021

Pala

2025-07-26

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between James vs Baby Sebastian regarding Execution Petition

Execution Petition

OS NO: 62/2010

Pala

2025-06-17

approximately-15 years

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Tomy Joseph vs Sabu Joseph regarding mediation settlement

Civil Suit

O. S. No. 141/2022

Pala

2025-06-28

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Vaikkathumala - kollappillimala Drinking Water Project vs Koodappulam Public Irrigation Project regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

O. S. No. 157/2022

Pala

2025-06-28

approximately-3 years 6 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

39%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,022 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 4.2 years

Settlement Likelihood 14%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 574 cases)
Sale deed (in 480 cases)
Tax receipt (in 375 cases)
Land Tax Receipt (in 183 cases)
Death Certificate (in 182 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 5903
Defendant Won: 8099

8119

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

25%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Lack of Evidence Presented

Plaintiffs consistently failed to produce necessary evidence to support their claims or prove their case.

Found in 25 cases (25%) Medium Impact

Absence of Plaintiffs in Court

Several cases were dismissed due to the absence of plaintiffs or their legal representation during hearings.

Found in 30 cases (30%) High Impact

Non-Payment of Costs or Fees

Many plaintiffs failed to pay required costs or court fees, resulting in dismissal of their petitions.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Default Dismissals for Lack of Action

Cases were dismissed for default due to plaintiffs not taking necessary actions or steps mandated by the court.

Found in 25 cases (25%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Lack of Evidence Presented

Absence of Plaintiffs in Court

Non-Payment of Costs or Fees

Default Dismissals for Lack of Action

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?