| Niyamam AI

Displaying 2191 - 2195 of 15105

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between M M Salim vs Muhammad Faisal regarding temporary injunction for property rights.

Civil Suit

OS No.299/2019

2025-08-02

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Mary vs Sunitha et al regarding partition

Civil Suit

O. S. No.232/2024

Perumbavoor

2025-08-11

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Kunnathunadu Taluk Housing Co-operative Society No. E-307 et al vs Abraham A P et al regarding execution of decree debt

Civil Suit

E.P. 197/2022 in ARC No.391/2018

Perumbavoor

2025-08-11

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Kunjumuhammad vs Abdul Kareem regarding construction of a residential house

Civil Suit

OS No.11/2020

2025-08-07

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Mary et al vs Kuruppampady Marthamariyam Ya. Su. Cath. et al regarding modification of interim injunction.

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 9/2004

2025-08-13

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

39%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,022 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 4.2 years

Settlement Likelihood 14%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 574 cases)
Sale deed (in 480 cases)
Tax receipt (in 375 cases)
Land Tax Receipt (in 183 cases)
Death Certificate (in 182 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 5903
Defendant Won: 8099

8137

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

45%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Absence of Plaintiff

Plaintiff consistently failed to appear in court, leading to case dismissals.

Found in 45 cases (45%) High Impact

Failure to Produce Necessary Documents

Plaintiff did not provide essential documents required for proof, which resulted in case dismissal.

Found in 30 cases (30%) High Impact

Non-Payment of Required Costs

Plaintiff's failure to pay court-ordered costs led to numerous dismissals.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

Lack of Representation

Plaintiffs often failed to secure legal representation at hearings, resulting in case dismissals.

Found in 10 cases (10%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Absence of Plaintiff

Failure to Produce Necessary Documents

Non-Payment of Required Costs

Lack of Representation

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?