| Niyamam AI

Displaying 14336 - 14340 of 15085

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Bank of Baroda vs Elsy George et al regarding settlement out of court

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 874/2024

ERNAKULAM

2025-06-02

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between M/s. Sunitha Sales & Service (P) Ltd. vs Abhilash V regarding decree enforcement

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 897/2019

Ernakulam

2026-12-20

7 years

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between A. K. Javashankar vs Kalpaka Builders Private Ltd regarding dismissal for default

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 923/2023

ERNAKULAM

2025-06-02

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between State Bank of India vs Mr.Joseph Thomas regarding settlement of matter

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 1015/2023

Ernakulam

2025-06-02

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between State Bank Of India vs Jim Devasia et al regarding refund of court fee.

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 1049/2022

Ernakulam

2025-06-02

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

39%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,022 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 4.2 years

Settlement Likelihood 14%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 574 cases)
Sale deed (in 480 cases)
Tax receipt (in 375 cases)
Land Tax Receipt (in 183 cases)
Death Certificate (in 182 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 5903
Defendant Won: 8099

8130

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

40%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Absence

Plaintiff frequently failed to appear in court, resulting in case dismissal for default.

Found in 40 cases (40%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Judgments revealed plaintiffs did not present sufficient evidence to support their claims.

Found in 25 cases (25%) Medium Impact

Failure to Produce Documents

Petitioners often did not submit necessary documentation required for their case.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Non-Payment of Costs

Dismissing judgments indicated plaintiffs failed to pay required costs or fees on time.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Absence

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Produce Documents

Non-Payment of Costs

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?