| Niyamam AI

Displaying 11101 - 11105 of 15250

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between M/s. Plant Lipids Private Limited vs Sajan S regarding suit filed under Section 26 and Order VII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908

Civil Suit

OS No. 16 / 2020

2024-05-22

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Azhakan vs Suresh M.A et al regarding dismissal for default

Civil Suit

OS No. 47 / 2021

Kolenchery, Ernakulam District

2024-05-25

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Sebastian V Sebastian vs Mita Mariam Sabu et al regarding I.A No. 27/2024 in I.A No.3/2023

Civil Suit

OS No. 30 / 2023

2024-11-08

Unknown

View Full Details

Case between PEPCO vs P.P Corporation regarding Execution Petition

Execution Petition

OS. No. 20/2018

2024-03-01

approximately-5 years

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between George K John et al vs Mar Gheevarghese Christian Association et al regarding Suit dismissed as not pressed.

Civil Suit

OS No. 26 / 2024

2024-06-15

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

39%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,022 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 4.2 years

Settlement Likelihood 14%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 574 cases)
Sale deed (in 480 cases)
Tax receipt (in 375 cases)
Land Tax Receipt (in 183 cases)
Death Certificate (in 182 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 5903
Defendant Won: 8099

8221

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

35%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Absence of Plaintiff or Representation

Most cases were dismissed due to the plaintiffs being absent or without legal representation during hearings.

Found in 35 cases (35%) High Impact

Failure to Produce Evidence

Plaintiffs frequently failed to provide necessary evidence to support their claims, leading to dismissals.

Found in 24 cases (24%) Medium Impact

Non-Payment of Costs or Fees

Dismissals occurred when plaintiffs did not pay court-ordered costs or fees, resulting in case rejection.

Found in 22 cases (22%) Medium Impact

Default Dismissals for Various Reasons

A significant number of cases were dismissed for default due to various procedural failures or inactivity.

Found in 19 cases (19%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Absence of Plaintiff or Representation

Failure to Produce Evidence

Non-Payment of Costs or Fees

Default Dismissals for Various Reasons

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?