| Niyamam AI

Displaying 1021 - 1025 of 15098

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Shahul Hameed vs Nazar et al regarding declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

Original Suit No. 81/2024

Varkala Taluk

2025-09-16

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Shahul Hameed vs Nazar et al regarding declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

Original Suit No. 81/ 2024

Varkala

2025-09-16

approximately-10 years 4 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Sudha vs Ravi et al regarding execution of decree

Execution Petition

EP.No 23/2023 IN OS No. 81//2017

Varkala, Kerala

2025-09-18

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Thankamani vs Rethnamma et al regarding injunction against encroachment.

Civil Suit

OS NO. 327/ 2025

Thiruvananthapuram

2025-09-17

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Sulfi Jihan vs Sumisha, Yasin et al regarding ad-interim injunction.

Civil Suit

OS NO. 331/ 2025

Varkala

2025-09-19

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

39%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,022 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 4.2 years

Settlement Likelihood 14%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 574 cases)
Sale deed (in 480 cases)
Tax receipt (in 375 cases)
Land Tax Receipt (in 183 cases)
Death Certificate (in 182 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 5903
Defendant Won: 8099

8133

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

30%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Absence of Plaintiff

Cases were dismissed due to the plaintiffs' failure to appear or provide representation in court.

Found in 30 cases (30%) High Impact

Failure to Produce Necessary Documents

Plaintiffs often failed to submit essential documents required to support their claims, leading to dismissals.

Found in 25 cases (25%) High Impact

Non-Payment of Court Costs

Dismissals frequently occurred when plaintiffs did not pay required costs or fees, resulting in inaction.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Plaintiffs often failed to provide sufficient evidence to substantiate their claims, leading to case dismissals.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Absence of Plaintiff

Failure to Produce Necessary Documents

Non-Payment of Court Costs

Lack of Evidence Presented

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?